llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Wild Bench Leaderboard

Wild Bench is an automated evaluation framework for large language models using 1,024 challenging, real-world tasks selected from over one million human-chatbot conversation logs.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models8
Model coverage8
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Wild Bench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

8 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMAMiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512)Mistral AIScore68.50%Percentile100.00%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMAMistral Large 3Mistral AIScore68.50%Percentile85.71%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMAMinistral 3 (8B Instruct 2512)Mistral AIScore66.80%Percentile71.43%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelMAMistral Small 3.2 24B InstructMistral AIScore65.33%Percentile57.14%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelMAMinistral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)Mistral AIScore56.80%Percentile42.86%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelMAMistral Small 3 24B InstructMistral AIScore52.20%Percentile28.57%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelALJamba 1.5 LargeAI21 LabsScore48.50%Percentile14.29%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelALJamba 1.5 MiniAI21 LabsScore42.40%Percentile0.00%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Wild Bench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Wild Bench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Wild Bench

The Top AI Models for Wild Bench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Wild Bench?

What Wild Bench measures and how its scores work.

WildBench is an automated evaluation framework that benchmarks large language models on 1,024 challenging, real-world tasks.

It measures model performance using WB-Reward and WB-Score with task-specific checklists.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Wild Bench
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Wild Bench.

Which model scores highest on Wild Bench?

MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) is currently ranked first with 68.50%.

What are the top three models on Wild Bench?

The current leaders are MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) (68.50%), Mistral Large 3 (68.50%), and Ministral 3 (8B Instruct 2512) (66.80%).

Which Wild Bench model has the lowest official input price?

MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.10 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Wild Bench results?

The fastest matched records are Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct (134.00 tok/s via Mistral AI), Jamba 1.5 Mini (100.00 tok/s via Google), and Jamba 1.5 Large (42.00 tok/s via Google).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Wild Bench measure?

It measures model performance using WB-Reward and WB-Score with task-specific checklists.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

8 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512)68.50%
Rank #2Mistral Large 368.50%
Rank #3Ministral 3 (8B Instruct 2512)66.80%
Rank #4Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct65.33%

Ranking basisThis wild bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512)Mistral AI
    Score
    68.50%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.10 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 8 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Wild Bench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MA
    Mistral Large 3Mistral AI
    Score
    68.50%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 8 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Wild Bench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MA
    Mistral AI
    Score
    66.80%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.10 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 8 compared models
    • 71th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Wild Bench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    MA
    Mistral AI
    Score
    65.33%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 8 compared models
    • 57th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Wild Bench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MA
    Mistral AI
    Score
    56.80%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.10 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 8 compared models
    • 43th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Wild Bench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Wild Bench

MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) currently leads Wild Bench with 68.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Ministral 3 (8B Instruct 2512)
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)
Benchmark rank #1MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512)68.50% · $0.10 input / $0.10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Mistral Large 368.50% · $0.50 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Ministral 3 (8B Instruct 2512)66.80% · $0.10 input / $0.10 output per 1M tokens