image to text benchmark
VQAv2 (test) is a visual question answering benchmark based on VQA v2.0, containing 1,105,904 questions across 204,721 COCO images.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelME | Score75.20% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis vqav2 (test) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct currently leads VQAv2 (test) with 75.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What VQAv2 (test) measures and how its scores work.
VQAv2 (test) is a balanced visual question answering dataset with complementary image pairs where the same question yields different answers.
It measures visual question answering involving visual understanding, language, and commonsense knowledge.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about VQAv2 (test).
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is currently ranked first with 75.20%.
The current leaders are Llama 3.2 11B Instruct (75.20%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
The fastest matched records are Llama 3.2 11B Instruct (108.00 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures visual question answering involving visual understanding, language, and commonsense knowledge.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.