audio benchmark
VocalSound is a dataset of over 21,000 crowdsourced recordings of human non-speech vocalizations from 3,365 unique subjects.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score93.90% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis vocalsound AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B currently leads VocalSound with 93.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What VocalSound measures and how its scores work.
VocalSound is an audio dataset containing recordings of laughter, sighs, coughs, throat clearing, sneezes, and sniffs for audio event classification and recognition.
It measures audio event classification and recognition of human non-speech vocalizations using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about VocalSound.
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is currently ranked first with 93.90%.
The current leaders are Qwen2.5-Omni-7B (93.90%).
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures audio event classification and recognition of human non-speech vocalizations using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.