legal benchmark
TruthfulQA is a benchmark measuring whether language models generate truthful answers to questions.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMI | Score88.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMI | Score77.50% | Percentile94.12% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelIB | Score66.86% | Percentile88.24% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelMI | Score66.40% | Percentile82.35% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelMI | Score64.00% | Percentile76.47% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelNR | Score63.29% | Percentile70.59% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelNV | Score58.63% | Percentile64.71% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAC | Score58.40% | Percentile58.82% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelAL | Score58.30% | Percentile52.94% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelIB | Score58.10% | Percentile47.06% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelAC | Score57.80% | Percentile41.18% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelCO | Score56.30% | Percentile35.29% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelAC | Score54.80% | Percentile29.41% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelAC | Score54.20% | Percentile23.53% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelAL | Score54.10% | Percentile17.65% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelIB | Score52.15% | Percentile11.76% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank17 | ModelAC | Score50.60% | Percentile5.88% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank18 | ModelMA | Score50.30% | Percentile0.00% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What TruthfulQA measures and how its scores work.
TruthfulQA comprises 817 questions across 38 categories, including health, law, finance and politics.
It measures models' ability to avoid generating false answers associated with human false beliefs, misconceptions and texts.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about TruthfulQA.
MAI-Thinking-1 is currently ranked first with 88.00%.
The current leaders are MAI-Thinking-1 (88.00%), Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct (77.50%), and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (66.86%).
Phi 4 Mini has the lowest matched official input price at $0.08 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Jamba 1.5 Mini (100.00 tok/s via Google), Command R+ (59.00 tok/s via Cohere), and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct (44.00 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures models' ability to avoid generating false answers associated with human false beliefs, misconceptions and texts.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
18 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis truthfulqa AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
MAI-Thinking-1 currently leads TruthfulQA with 88.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.