multimodal benchmark
TIR-Bench is a multimodal benchmark for tool-calling and multimodal interaction.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score61.60% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score59.80% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score55.50% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score53.20% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What TIR-Bench measures and how its scores work.
TIR-Bench is a benchmark for testing visual instruction following and execution reliability in tool-calling and multimodal interaction.
TIR-Bench measures visual instruction following and execution reliability using Score, reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about TIR-Bench.
Qwen3.6 Plus is currently ranked first with 61.60%.
The current leaders are Qwen3.6 Plus (61.60%), Qwen3.5-27B (59.80%), and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (55.50%).
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.25 input / $2.0 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
TIR-Bench measures visual instruction following and execution reliability using Score, reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis tir-bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen3.6 Plus currently leads TIR-Bench with 61.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.