llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Terminal-Bench 4.0 Leaderboard

Terminal-Bench 4.0 evaluates AI agents on 66 real-world tasks in terminal and command-line containerized environments, including science-adjacent and frontier engineering problems.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models13
Model coverage13
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Terminal-Bench 4.0 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

13 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-6 AstraOpenAIScore57.70%Percentile100.00%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicScore55.80%Percentile91.67%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicScore51.80%Percentile83.33%Participants13EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicScore44.50%Percentile75.00%Participants13EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelZAGLM-5.3Zhipu AIScore41.80%Percentile66.67%Participants13EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore37.30%Percentile58.33%Participants13EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore23.60%Percentile50.00%Participants13EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore21.50%Percentile41.67%Participants13EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelXAGrok 4.6xAIScore20.30%Percentile33.33%Participants13EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelGOGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleScore19.10%Percentile25.00%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore17.30%Percentile16.67%Participants13EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicScore12.40%Percentile8.33%Participants13EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelXAGrok 4.5xAIScore12.40%Percentile0.00%Participants13EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Terminal-Bench 4.0 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Terminal-Bench 4.0 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Terminal-Bench 4.0

The Top AI Models for Terminal-Bench 4.0

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Terminal-Bench 4.0?

What Terminal-Bench 4.0 measures and how its scores work.

Terminal-Bench 4.0 is a reasoning benchmark for AI agents working in terminal and command-line containerized environments.

It measures performance across 66 tasks using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Terminal-Bench 4.0
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Terminal-Bench 4.0.

Which model scores highest on Terminal-Bench 4.0?

GPT-6 Astra is currently ranked first with 57.70%.

What are the top three models on Terminal-Bench 4.0?

The current leaders are GPT-6 Astra (57.70%), Claude Fable 5.1 (55.80%), and Claude Opus 5 (51.80%).

Which Terminal-Bench 4.0 model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Terminal-Bench 4.0 results?

The fastest matched records are GLM-5.3 (472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI), Grok 4.6 (132.69 tok/s via xAI), and GPT-5.6 Terra (99.35 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Terminal-Bench 4.0 measure?

It measures performance across 66 tasks using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

13 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-6 Astra57.70%
Rank #2Claude Fable 5.155.80%
Rank #3Claude Opus 551.80%
Rank #4Claude Fable 544.50%

Ranking basisThis terminal-bench 4.0 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    Score
    57.70%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 30.66 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 13 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Terminal-Bench 4.0, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
    Score
    55.80%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 7.67 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 13 compared models
    • 92th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Terminal-Bench 4.0, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    51.80%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 62.88 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 13 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Terminal-Bench 4.0, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    44.50%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.18 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 13 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Terminal-Bench 4.0, not total model capability
  5. 05
    ZA
    Zhipu AI
    Score
    41.80%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 13 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Terminal-Bench 4.0, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Terminal-Bench 4.0

GPT-6 Astra currently leads Terminal-Bench 4.0 with 57.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Opus 5
Claude Fable 5
GLM-5.3
Benchmark rank #1GPT-6 Astra57.70% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Fable 5.155.80% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Opus 551.80% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens