llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Tau2 Telecom Leaderboard

Tau2 Telecom evaluates conversational agents in shared telecommunications troubleshooting scenarios modeled as a Dec-POMDP.

Updated Sep 7, 2026

Models36
Model coverage36
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Tau2 Telecom Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 36 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore99.30%Percentile100.00%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMELongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601MeituanScore99.30%Percentile97.14%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIScore98.90%Percentile94.29%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIScore98.70%Percentile91.43%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicScore98.20%Percentile88.57%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIScore98.00%Percentile85.71%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicScore97.90%Percentile82.86%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelXIMiMo-V2-ProXiaomiScore96.80%Percentile80.00%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelOPGPT-5OpenAIScore96.70%Percentile77.14%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelOPGPT-5.1OpenAIScore95.60%Percentile74.29%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-5.1 InstantOpenAIScore95.60%Percentile71.43%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelOPGPT-5.1 ThinkingOpenAIScore95.60%Percentile68.57%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-5.4 miniOpenAIScore93.40%Percentile65.71%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelAMNova 2 ProAmazonScore92.70%Percentile62.86%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelOPGPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIScore92.50%Percentile60.00%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelMEMuse SparkMetaScore91.50%Percentile57.14%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelMIMiniMax M2MiniMaxScore87.00%Percentile54.29%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelMIMiniMax M2.1MiniMaxScore87.00%Percentile51.43%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelCOCommand A+CohereScore85.00%Percentile48.57%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelMELongCat-Flash-ThinkingMeituanScore83.10%Percentile45.71%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelANClaude Haiku 4.5AnthropicScore83.00%Percentile42.86%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelAMNova 2 OmniAmazonScore80.00%Percentile40.00%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelAMNova 2 LiteAmazonScore76.00%Percentile37.14%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelMELongCat-Flash-ChatMeituanScore73.68%Percentile34.29%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelLAEXAONE 4.5 33BLG AI ResearchScore73.00%Percentile31.43%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelMELongCat-Flash-LiteMeituanScore72.80%Percentile28.57%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelMIMAI-Code-1-FlashMicrosoftScore71.70%Percentile25.71%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelMAKimi K2 InstructMoonshot AIScore65.80%Percentile22.86%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank29ModelMAKimi K2-Instruct-0905Moonshot AIScore65.80%Percentile20.00%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank30ModelNVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIAScore64.36%Percentile17.14%Participants36EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Tau2 Telecom Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Tau2 Telecom Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Tau2 Telecom

The Top AI Models for Tau2 Telecom

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Tau2 Telecom?

What Tau2 Telecom measures and how its scores work.

Tau2 Telecom is a telecom-domain benchmark in which agents and users use tools in a dual-control environment.

It measures Score as a ratio, testing coordination and communication capabilities.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Tau2 Telecom
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Tau2 Telecom.

Which model scores highest on Tau2 Telecom?

Claude Opus 4.6 is currently ranked first with 99.30%.

What are the top three models on Tau2 Telecom?

The current leaders are Claude Opus 4.6 (99.30%), LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 (99.30%), and GPT-5.4 (98.90%).

Which Tau2 Telecom model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.4 nano has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.3 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Tau2 Telecom results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5.5 (134.94 tok/s via OpenAI), GPT-4o (132.00 tok/s via OpenAI), and Claude Opus 4.6 (123.15 tok/s via Anthropic).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Tau2 Telecom measure?

It measures Score as a ratio, testing coordination and communication capabilities.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

36 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Opus 4.699.30%
Rank #2LongCat-Flash-Thinking-260199.30%
Rank #3GPT-5.498.90%
Rank #4GPT-5.298.70%

Ranking basisThis tau2 telecom AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
    Score
    99.30%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 123.15 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 36 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau2 Telecom, not total model capability
  2. 02
    ME
    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601Meituan
    Score
    99.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 36 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau2 Telecom, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    98.90%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 50.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 36 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau2 Telecom, not total model capability
  4. 04
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    98.70%
    Price
    $1.8 input / $14 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 36 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau2 Telecom, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    98.20%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 36 compared models
    • 89th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau2 Telecom, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Tau2 Telecom

Claude Opus 4.6 currently leads Tau2 Telecom with 99.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.4
GPT-5.2
Claude Opus 4.5
Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 4.699.30% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2LongCat-Flash-Thinking-260199.30%
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.498.90% · $2.5 input / $15 output per 1M tokens