agents benchmark
SWE-Marathon is an ultra-long-horizon software engineering benchmark covering tasks such as building compilers, optimizing kernels, and developing production-grade services.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelZA | Score42.50% | Percentile100.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMA | Score42.00% | Percentile75.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelTE | Score31.90% | Percentile50.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelXA | Score29.00% | Percentile25.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelZA | Score13.00% | Percentile0.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What SWE-Marathon measures and how its scores work.
SWE-Marathon is a software engineering benchmark for evaluating agents on tasks such as building compilers, optimizing kernels, and developing production-grade services.
It measures whether agents can sustain quality across extremely long engineering trajectories, using the Score metric with a ratio unit.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about SWE-Marathon.
GLM-5.3 is currently ranked first with 42.50%.
The current leaders are GLM-5.3 (42.50%), Kimi K3 (42.00%), and Hy4 preview (31.90%).
GLM-5.3 has the lowest matched official input price at $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are GLM-5.3 (472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI), Grok 4.5 (80.00 tok/s via xAI), and GLM-5.2 (3.96 tok/s via ZAI).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures whether agents can sustain quality across extremely long engineering trajectories, using the Score metric with a ratio unit.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
5 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis swe-marathon AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
GLM-5.3 currently leads SWE-Marathon with 42.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.