llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

agents benchmark

SWE-Marathon Leaderboard

SWE-Marathon is an ultra-long-horizon software engineering benchmark covering tasks such as building compilers, optimizing kernels, and developing production-grade services.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models5
Model coverage5
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

SWE-Marathon Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

5 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelZAGLM-5.3Zhipu AIScore42.50%Percentile100.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore42.00%Percentile75.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore31.90%Percentile50.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelXAGrok 4.5xAIScore29.00%Percentile25.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIScore13.00%Percentile0.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

SWE-Marathon Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

SWE-Marathon Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

SWE-Marathon

The Top AI Models for SWE-Marathon

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is SWE-Marathon?

What SWE-Marathon measures and how its scores work.

SWE-Marathon is a software engineering benchmark for evaluating agents on tasks such as building compilers, optimizing kernels, and developing production-grade services.

It measures whether agents can sustain quality across extremely long engineering trajectories, using the Score metric with a ratio unit.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
SWE-Marathon
Modality
text
Primary category
agents
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about SWE-Marathon.

Which model scores highest on SWE-Marathon?

GLM-5.3 is currently ranked first with 42.50%.

What are the top three models on SWE-Marathon?

The current leaders are GLM-5.3 (42.50%), Kimi K3 (42.00%), and Hy4 preview (31.90%).

Which SWE-Marathon model has the lowest official input price?

GLM-5.3 has the lowest matched official input price at $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among SWE-Marathon results?

The fastest matched records are GLM-5.3 (472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI), Grok 4.5 (80.00 tok/s via xAI), and GLM-5.2 (3.96 tok/s via ZAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does SWE-Marathon measure?

It measures whether agents can sustain quality across extremely long engineering trajectories, using the Score metric with a ratio unit.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

5 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GLM-5.342.50%
Rank #2Kimi K342.00%
Rank #3Hy4 preview31.90%
Rank #4Grok 4.529.00%

Ranking basisThis swe-marathon AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ZA
    GLM-5.3Zhipu AI
    Score
    42.50%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 5 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-Marathon, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MA
    Kimi K3Moonshot AI
    Score
    42.00%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 5 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-Marathon, not total model capability
  3. 03
    TE
    Tencent
    Score
    31.90%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 5 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-Marathon, not total model capability
  4. 04
    XA
    xAI
    Score
    29.00%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 80.00 tok/s via xAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 5 compared models
    • 25th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-Marathon, not total model capability
  5. 05
    ZA
    Zhipu AI
    Score
    13.00%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 3.96 tok/s via ZAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 5 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-Marathon, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for SWE-Marathon

GLM-5.3 currently leads SWE-Marathon with 42.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Hy4 preview
Grok 4.5
GLM-5.2
Benchmark rank #1GLM-5.342.50% · $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Kimi K342.00% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Hy4 preview31.90%