reasoning benchmark
SWE-Lancer is a benchmark of large language models on over 1,400 real-world freelance software engineering tasks from Upwork, valued at $1 million USD in total.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelOP | Score66.30% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelOP | Score37.30% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelOP | Score32.60% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelOP | Score18.00% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What SWE-Lancer measures and how its scores work.
SWE-Lancer includes independent engineering tasks graded via end-to-end tests and managerial tasks assessed against original engineering managers' choices.
It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, across software engineering and managerial tasks.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about SWE-Lancer.
GPT-5.1 Codex is currently ranked first with 66.30%.
The current leaders are GPT-5.1 Codex (66.30%), GPT-4.5 (37.30%), and GPT-4o (32.60%).
o3-mini has the lowest matched official input price at $1.1 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are GPT-4o (132.00 tok/s via OpenAI), o3-mini (115.00 tok/s via Azure), and GPT-5.1 Codex (50.00 tok/s via OpenAI).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, across software engineering and managerial tasks.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis swe-lancer AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
GPT-5.1 Codex currently leads SWE-Lancer with 66.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.