agents benchmark
SWE-fficiency is an open-source benchmark and workflow for evaluating language models on optimizing the runtime efficiency of real-world software engineering tasks.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMI | Score34.80% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis swe-fficiency AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
MiniMax M3 currently leads SWE-fficiency with 34.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What SWE-fficiency measures and how its scores work.
SWE-fficiency is an open-source benchmark and workflow in the agents category.
It measures how well agents can autonomously improve code performance, using the Score metric reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about SWE-fficiency.
MiniMax M3 is currently ranked first with 34.80%.
The current leaders are MiniMax M3 (34.80%).
MiniMax M3 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are MiniMax M3 (6.61 tok/s via MiniMax).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures how well agents can autonomously improve code performance, using the Score metric reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.