reasoning benchmark
SWE-bench Verified (Agentic Coding) is a human-filtered subset of 500 software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues across 12 popular Python repositories.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Score77.20% | Percentile100.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMA | Score65.80% | Percentile0.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What SWE-bench Verified (Agentic Coding) measures and how its scores work.
SWE-bench Verified (Agentic Coding) is a benchmark in which language models generate patches to resolve described problems in provided codebases.
It measures AI's agentic coding skills in navigating codebases, understanding software engineering problems, and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and files to fix well-defined issues, using Score reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about SWE-bench Verified (Agentic Coding).
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is currently ranked first with 77.20%.
The current leaders are Claude Sonnet 4.5 (77.20%) and Kimi K2 Instruct (65.80%).
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Claude Sonnet 4.5 (42.00 tok/s via Anthropic).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures AI's agentic coding skills in navigating codebases, understanding software engineering problems, and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and files to fix well-defined issues, using Score reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis swe-bench verified (agentic coding) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Sonnet 4.5 currently leads SWE-bench Verified (Agentic Coding) with 77.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.