multimodal benchmark
SWE-Bench Multimodal extends SWE-Bench to evaluate language models on software engineering tasks involving visual inputs alongside code understanding.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Score59.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score38.60% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAN | Score38.40% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAN | Score28.10% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What SWE-Bench Multimodal measures and how its scores work.
SWE-Bench Multimodal is a multimodal benchmark for evaluating language models on software engineering tasks with visual inputs such as screenshots, UI mockups, and diagrams alongside code understanding.
It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, on software engineering tasks involving visual inputs and code understanding.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about SWE-Bench Multimodal.
Claude Mythos Preview is currently ranked first with 59.00%.
The current leaders are Claude Mythos Preview (59.00%), Qwen3.8-27B (38.60%), and Claude Opus 4.8 (38.40%).
Claude Sonnet 5 has the lowest matched official input price at $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Claude Opus 4.8 (42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI) and Claude Sonnet 5 (42.00 tok/s via Anthropic).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, on software engineering tasks involving visual inputs and code understanding.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis swe-bench multimodal AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Mythos Preview currently leads SWE-Bench Multimodal with 59.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.