llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

SWE-bench Multilingual Leaderboard

SWE-bench Multilingual is a multilingual software engineering benchmark covering Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models50
Model coverage50
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

SWE-bench Multilingual Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 50 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicScore93.90%Percentile100.00%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicScore90.30%Percentile97.96%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Mythos PreviewAnthropicScore87.30%Percentile95.92%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore84.40%Percentile93.88%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Haiku 5.5AnthropicScore83.70%Percentile91.84%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank06ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore82.90%Percentile89.80%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore81.00%Percentile87.76%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3.8 FlashAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore81.00%Percentile85.71%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank09ModelPOLaguna S 2.1PoolsideScore78.50%Percentile83.67%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank10ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicScore78.30%Percentile81.63%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore78.30%Percentile79.59%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank12ModelRABeam 1.0Reflection AIScore78.30%Percentile77.55%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank13ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore77.83%Percentile75.51%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank14ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore76.70%Percentile73.47%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank15ModelMIMiniMax M2.7MiniMaxScore76.50%Percentile71.43%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank16ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeekScore76.20%Percentile69.39%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank17ModelTEHy3TencentScore75.80%Percentile67.35%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank18ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore75.80%Percentile65.31%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank19ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore73.80%Percentile63.27%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank20ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxDeepSeekScore73.30%Percentile61.22%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank21ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore73.00%Percentile59.18%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank22ModelMIMiniMax M2.1MiniMaxScore72.50%Percentile57.14%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank23ModelINLing 3.0 FlashInclusionaiScore72.40%Percentile55.10%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank24ModelXIMiMo-V2-FlashXiaomiScore71.70%Percentile53.06%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank25ModelXIMiMo-V2-ProXiaomiScore71.70%Percentile51.02%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank26ModelACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore71.30%Percentile48.98%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank27ModelDEDeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)DeepSeekScore70.20%Percentile46.94%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank28ModelDEDeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeekScore70.20%Percentile44.90%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank29ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423DeepSeekScore70.20%Percentile42.86%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank30ModelACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore69.30%Percentile40.82%Participants50EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

SWE-bench Multilingual Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

SWE-bench Multilingual Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

SWE-bench Multilingual

The Top AI Models for SWE-bench Multilingual

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is SWE-bench Multilingual?

What SWE-bench Multilingual measures and how its scores work.

SWE-bench Multilingual contains 1,632 instances annotated from 2,456 candidates by 68 expert annotators to evaluate Large Language Models across diverse software ecosystems beyond Python.

It measures issue resolving in software engineering using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
SWE-bench Multilingual
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about SWE-bench Multilingual.

Which model scores highest on SWE-bench Multilingual?

Claude Opus 5.5 is currently ranked first with 93.90%.

What are the top three models on SWE-bench Multilingual?

The current leaders are Claude Opus 5.5 (93.90%), Claude Sonnet 5.5 (90.30%), and Claude Mythos Preview (87.30%).

Which SWE-bench Multilingual model has the lowest official input price?

Claude Haiku 5.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among SWE-bench Multilingual results?

The fastest matched records are MiniMax M2.1 (100.00 tok/s via MiniMax), MiniMax M2 (70.00 tok/s via MiniMax), and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) (50.00 tok/s via DeepSeek).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does SWE-bench Multilingual measure?

It measures issue resolving in software engineering using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

50 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Opus 5.593.90%
Rank #2Claude Sonnet 5.590.30%
Rank #3Claude Mythos Preview87.30%
Rank #4Claude Opus 4.884.40%

Ranking basisThis swe-bench multilingual AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Score
    93.90%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 12.33 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 50 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-bench Multilingual, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
    Score
    90.30%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 50 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-bench Multilingual, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    87.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 50 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-bench Multilingual, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    84.40%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 50 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-bench Multilingual, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    83.70%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 50 compared models
    • 92th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-bench Multilingual, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for SWE-bench Multilingual

Claude Opus 5.5 currently leads SWE-bench Multilingual with 93.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Mythos Preview
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Haiku 5.5
Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 5.593.90% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Sonnet 5.590.30% · $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Mythos Preview87.30%