llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

agents benchmark

SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA Leaderboard

SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA evaluates a model's ability to answer questions about real codebases.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMEMuse Spark 1.3MetaScore59.40%Percentile100.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelPOLaguna S 2.1PoolsideScore46.20%Percentile50.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore37.90%Percentile0.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA

The Top AI Models for SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA?

What SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA measures and how its scores work.

SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA is a benchmark for evaluating models on questions about real codebases.

It measures repository-level comprehension and the ability to reason about code structure, behavior, and intent across an entire project, using the Score metric as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA
Modality
text
Primary category
agents
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA.

Which model scores highest on SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA?

Muse Spark 1.3 is currently ranked first with 59.40%.

What are the top three models on SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA?

The current leaders are Muse Spark 1.3 (59.40%), Laguna S 2.1 (46.20%), and MiniMax M3 (37.90%).

Which SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA model has the lowest official input price?

MiniMax M3 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA results?

The fastest matched records are Muse Spark 1.3 (8.44 tok/s via Meta Model API) and MiniMax M3 (6.61 tok/s via MiniMax).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA measure?

It measures repository-level comprehension and the ability to reason about code structure, behavior, and intent across an entire project, using the Score metric as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Muse Spark 1.359.40%
Rank #2Laguna S 2.146.20%
Rank #3MiniMax M337.90%

Ranking basisThis swe atlas - codebase qna AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Muse Spark 1.3Meta
    Score
    59.40%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 8.44 tok/s via Meta Model API

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 3 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA, not total model capability
  2. 02
    PO
    Laguna S 2.1Poolside
    Score
    46.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 3 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MI
    MiniMax
    Score
    37.90%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 6.61 tok/s via MiniMax

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 3 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA

Muse Spark 1.3 currently leads SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA with 59.40%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

MiniMax M3
Benchmark rank #1Muse Spark 1.359.40% · $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Laguna S 2.146.20%
Benchmark rank #3MiniMax M337.90% · $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens