language benchmark
Spider is a cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-SQL dataset with 10,181 questions and 5,693 unique complex SQL queries across 200 databases and 138 domains.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMA | Score63.50% | Percentile100.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score31.10% | Percentile0.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What Spider measures and how its scores work.
Spider is a language benchmark annotated by 11 college students that contains questions paired with complex SQL queries over databases with multiple tables.
It measures models' ability to generalize to new SQL queries and new database schemas.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Spider.
Codestral-22B is currently ranked first with 63.50%.
The current leaders are Codestral-22B (63.50%) and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct (31.10%).
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $1.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures models' ability to generalize to new SQL queries and new database schemas.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis spider AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Codestral-22B currently leads Spider with 63.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.