llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

agents benchmark

SkillsBench Leaderboard

SkillsBench evaluates coding agents on self-contained programming tasks across diverse software development scenarios.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models9
Model coverage9
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

SkillsBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

9 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.20%Percentile100.00%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore62.90%Percentile87.50%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore59.20%Percentile75.00%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelTEHy3TencentScore55.30%Percentile62.50%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore54.90%Percentile50.00%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore48.20%Percentile37.50%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore45.70%Percentile25.00%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore44.30%Percentile12.50%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore28.70%Percentile0.00%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

SkillsBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

SkillsBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

SkillsBench

The Top AI Models for SkillsBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is SkillsBench?

What SkillsBench measures and how its scores work.

SkillsBench is a benchmark for evaluating coding agents on self-contained programming tasks.

It measures practical engineering skills across diverse software development scenarios, using the Score metric in ratio units.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
SkillsBench
Modality
text
Primary category
agents
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about SkillsBench.

Which model scores highest on SkillsBench?

Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 70.20%.

What are the top three models on SkillsBench?

The current leaders are Qwen3.8 Max (70.20%), Hy4 preview (62.90%), and Qwen3.7 Max (59.20%).

Which SkillsBench model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.25 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among SkillsBench results?

The fastest matched records are Qwen3.8 Max (60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does SkillsBench measure?

It measures practical engineering skills across diverse software development scenarios, using the Score metric in ratio units.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

9 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen3.8 Max70.20%
Rank #2Hy4 preview62.90%
Rank #3Qwen3.7 Max59.20%
Rank #4Hy355.30%

Ranking basisThis skillsbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    70.20%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 9 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SkillsBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    TE
    Hy4 previewTencent
    Score
    62.90%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 9 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SkillsBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    59.20%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 9 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SkillsBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    TE
    Tencent
    Score
    55.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 9 compared models
    • 63th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SkillsBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    54.90%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 9 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SkillsBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for SkillsBench

Qwen3.8 Max currently leads SkillsBench with 70.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.7 Max
Hy3
Qwen3.7-Plus
Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.8 Max70.20% · $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Hy4 preview62.90%
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.7 Max59.20% · $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens