llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Unspecified benchmark

LM Arena Search Style Control Leaderboard

LM Arena Search Style Control is a current leaderboard using the Arena Rating metric.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models33
Model coverage33
MetricArena Rating
EvidenceA

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LM Arena Search Style Control Ranking

Higher arena rating ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 33 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Arena Rating
Percentile
Participants
Votes
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIArena Rating1,257.93 rating (1,251.46 rating - 1,264.40 rating)Percentile100.00%Participants33Votes60,437EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-6 AstraOpenAIArena Rating1,246.24 rating (1,238.20 rating - 1,254.28 rating)Percentile96.88%Participants33Votes18,483EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicArena Rating1,233.37 rating (1,226.20 rating - 1,240.54 rating)Percentile93.75%Participants33Votes12,782EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamArena Rating1,229.50 rating (1,216.20 rating - 1,242.79 rating)Percentile90.63%Participants33Votes1,870EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicArena Rating1,229.02 rating (1,222.44 rating - 1,235.60 rating)Percentile87.50%Participants33Votes73,596EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIArena Rating1,226.45 rating (1,221.46 rating - 1,231.45 rating)Percentile84.38%Participants33Votes125,957EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank07ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,222.05 rating (1,217.36 rating - 1,226.73 rating)Percentile81.25%Participants33Votes173,191EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank08ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicArena Rating1,214.35 rating (1,207.46 rating - 1,221.24 rating)Percentile78.13%Participants33Votes13,285EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank09ModelANClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicArena Rating1,211.23 rating (1,204.13 rating - 1,218.32 rating)Percentile75.00%Participants33Votes10,842EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank10ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicArena Rating1,209.71 rating (1,204.77 rating - 1,214.64 rating)Percentile71.88%Participants33Votes127,506EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank11ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleArena Rating1,206.62 rating (1,201.83 rating - 1,211.40 rating)Percentile68.75%Participants33Votes151,436EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank12ModelXAGrok-4.20 Multi-Agent BetaxAIArena Rating1,206.38 rating (1,200.83 rating - 1,211.94 rating)Percentile65.63%Participants33Votes126,238EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank13ModelXAGrok 4.5xAIArena Rating1,206.19 rating (1,200.29 rating - 1,212.09 rating)Percentile62.50%Participants33Votes76,458EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank14ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,201.93 rating (1,197.26 rating - 1,206.60 rating)Percentile59.38%Participants33Votes173,986EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank15ModelGOGemini 3 ProGoogleArena Rating1,200.75 rating (1,195.26 rating - 1,206.24 rating)Percentile56.25%Participants33Votes38,857EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank16ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIArena Rating1,196.26 rating (1,190.59 rating - 1,201.94 rating)Percentile53.13%Participants33Votes126,730EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank17ModelOPo3OpenAIArena Rating1,196.16 rating (1,189.43 rating - 1,202.90 rating)Percentile50.00%Participants33Votes20,770EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank18ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicArena Rating1,195.25 rating (1,189.61 rating - 1,200.89 rating)Percentile46.88%Participants33Votes106,304EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank19ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicArena Rating1,193.16 rating (1,186.87 rating - 1,199.45 rating)Percentile43.75%Participants33Votes72,978EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank20ModelXAGrok 4.3xAIArena Rating1,192.79 rating (1,187.93 rating - 1,197.65 rating)Percentile40.63%Participants33Votes128,393EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank21ModelGOGemini 3 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,188.68 rating (1,184.28 rating - 1,193.07 rating)Percentile37.50%Participants33Votes196,399EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank22ModelOPGPT-5OpenAIArena Rating1,187.73 rating (1,180.35 rating - 1,195.11 rating)Percentile34.38%Participants33Votes20,865EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank23ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicArena Rating1,186.69 rating (1,180.96 rating - 1,192.42 rating)Percentile31.25%Participants33Votes65,047EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank24ModelOPGPT-5.1OpenAIArena Rating1,183.64 rating (1,178.27 rating - 1,189.02 rating)Percentile28.13%Participants33Votes63,042EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank25ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.5AnthropicArena Rating1,175.98 rating (1,170.74 rating - 1,181.21 rating)Percentile25.00%Participants33Votes144,153EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank26ModelANClaude Opus 4.1AnthropicArena Rating1,167.09 rating (1,162.11 rating - 1,172.07 rating)Percentile21.88%Participants33Votes79,806EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank27ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIArena Rating1,161.40 rating (1,155.60 rating - 1,167.20 rating)Percentile18.75%Participants33Votes55,634EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank28ModelXAGrok 4 FastxAIArena Rating1,161.08 rating (1,156.26 rating - 1,165.89 rating)Percentile15.63%Participants33Votes43,083EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank29ModelANClaude Opus 4AnthropicArena Rating1,151.84 rating (1,146.29 rating - 1,157.39 rating)Percentile12.50%Participants33Votes31,506EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026
Rank30ModelGOGemini 2.5 ProGoogleArena Rating1,144.23 rating (1,139.43 rating - 1,149.03 rating)Percentile9.38%Participants33Votes86,689EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 13, 2026

LM Arena Search Style Control Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Search Style Control Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Search Style Control

The Top AI Models for LM Arena Search Style Control

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LM Arena Search Style Control?

What LM Arena Search Style Control measures and how its scores work.

LM Arena Search Style Control is a current leaderboard.

It measures Arena Rating, reported in rating units.

Scores are shown in rating. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of A.

Family
lm-arena-search-style-control
Modality
Unspecified
Primary category
Unspecified
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LM Arena. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LM Arena Search Style Control.

Which model scores highest on LM Arena Search Style Control?

GPT-5.6 Sol is currently ranked first with 1,257.93 rating.

What are the top three models on LM Arena Search Style Control?

The current leaders are GPT-5.6 Sol (1,257.93 rating), GPT-6 Astra (1,246.24 rating), and Claude Fable 5.1 (1,233.37 rating).

Which LM Arena Search Style Control model has the lowest official input price?

Gemini 3 Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LM Arena Search Style Control results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5 (100.00 tok/s via OpenAI), GPT-5.1 (100.00 tok/s via OpenAI), and Claude Opus 4.1 (100.00 tok/s via Anthropic).

Does the highest arena rating result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LM Arena Search Style Control measure?

It measures Arena Rating, reported in rating units.

Is a higher arena rating better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

33 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-5.6 Sol1,257.93 rating (1,251.46 rating - 1,264.40 rating)
Rank #2GPT-6 Astra1,246.24 rating (1,238.20 rating - 1,254.28 rating)
Rank #3Claude Fable 5.11,233.37 rating (1,226.20 rating - 1,240.54 rating)
Rank #4Qwen3.8 Max1,229.50 rating (1,216.20 rating - 1,242.79 rating)

Ranking basisThis lm arena search style control AI model leaderboard uses descending arena rating in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
    Arena Rating
    1,257.93 rating
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 25.46 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 33 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Search Style Control, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    Arena Rating
    1,246.24 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 33 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Search Style Control, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,233.37 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 33 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Search Style Control, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Arena Rating
    1,229.50 rating
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 33 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Search Style Control, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,229.02 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 33 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Search Style Control, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LM Arena Search Style Control

GPT-5.6 Sol currently leads LM Arena Search Style Control with 1,257.93 rating. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Fable 5.1
Qwen3.8 Max
Claude Fable 5
Benchmark rank #1GPT-5.6 Sol1,257.93 rating · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2GPT-6 Astra1,246.24 rating · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Fable 5.11,233.37 rating · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens