llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Unspecified benchmark

LM Arena Search Style Control Leaderboard

LM Arena Search Style Control is a current leaderboard using the Arena Rating metric.

Updated Sep 8, 2026

Models28
Model coverage28
MetricArena Rating
EvidenceA

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LM Arena Search Style Control Ranking

Higher arena rating ranks better on this benchmark.

28 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Arena Rating
Percentile
Participants
Votes
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIArena Rating1,255.76 rating (1,248.08 rating - 1,263.45 rating)Percentile100.00%Participants28Votes29,663EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicArena Rating1,228.92 rating (1,220.94 rating - 1,236.90 rating)Percentile96.30%Participants28Votes41,795EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIArena Rating1,223.60 rating (1,218.15 rating - 1,229.06 rating)Percentile92.59%Participants28Votes89,873EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,223.31 rating (1,218.17 rating - 1,228.45 rating)Percentile88.89%Participants28Votes134,699EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicArena Rating1,212.03 rating (1,206.55 rating - 1,217.50 rating)Percentile85.19%Participants28Votes91,394EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank06ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleArena Rating1,207.68 rating (1,202.37 rating - 1,212.98 rating)Percentile81.48%Participants28Votes113,282EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank07ModelXAGrok-4.20 Multi-Agent BetaxAIArena Rating1,204.91 rating (1,199.50 rating - 1,210.32 rating)Percentile77.78%Participants28Votes109,553EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank08ModelXAGrok 4.5xAIArena Rating1,202.41 rating (1,195.42 rating - 1,209.40 rating)Percentile74.07%Participants28Votes31,505EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank09ModelGOGemini 3 ProGoogleArena Rating1,201.38 rating (1,195.83 rating - 1,206.93 rating)Percentile70.37%Participants28Votes37,024EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank10ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,201.03 rating (1,195.94 rating - 1,206.11 rating)Percentile66.67%Participants28Votes134,905EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank11ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicArena Rating1,196.10 rating (1,189.11 rating - 1,203.09 rating)Percentile62.96%Participants28Votes40,230EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank12ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicArena Rating1,195.03 rating (1,188.59 rating - 1,201.46 rating)Percentile59.26%Participants28Votes70,998EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIArena Rating1,194.52 rating (1,188.87 rating - 1,200.18 rating)Percentile55.56%Participants28Votes110,116EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank14ModelXAGrok 4.3xAIArena Rating1,193.23 rating (1,187.94 rating - 1,198.53 rating)Percentile51.85%Participants28Votes91,483EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank15ModelOPo3OpenAIArena Rating1,191.88 rating (1,185.08 rating - 1,198.68 rating)Percentile48.15%Participants28Votes20,644EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank16ModelGOGemini 3 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,191.34 rating (1,186.52 rating - 1,196.16 rating)Percentile44.44%Participants28Votes149,334EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank17ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicArena Rating1,187.22 rating (1,181.46 rating - 1,192.98 rating)Percentile40.74%Participants28Votes61,573EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank18ModelOPGPT-5.1OpenAIArena Rating1,183.19 rating (1,177.76 rating - 1,188.62 rating)Percentile37.04%Participants28Votes59,909EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank19ModelOPGPT-5OpenAIArena Rating1,182.86 rating (1,175.38 rating - 1,190.34 rating)Percentile33.33%Participants28Votes20,781EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank20ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.5AnthropicArena Rating1,175.19 rating (1,170.04 rating - 1,180.35 rating)Percentile29.63%Participants28Votes127,378EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank21ModelANClaude Opus 4.1AnthropicArena Rating1,167.11 rating (1,162.13 rating - 1,172.08 rating)Percentile25.93%Participants28Votes76,933EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank22ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIArena Rating1,161.50 rating (1,155.64 rating - 1,167.36 rating)Percentile22.22%Participants28Votes52,712EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank23ModelXAGrok 4 FastxAIArena Rating1,160.31 rating (1,155.50 rating - 1,165.13 rating)Percentile18.52%Participants28Votes41,794EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank24ModelANClaude Opus 4AnthropicArena Rating1,150.60 rating (1,145.12 rating - 1,156.08 rating)Percentile14.81%Participants28Votes31,037EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank25ModelPESonar ProPerplexityArena Rating1,142.88 rating (1,137.07 rating - 1,148.69 rating)Percentile11.11%Participants28Votes28,519EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank26ModelGOGemini 2.5 ProGoogleArena Rating1,142.08 rating (1,137.36 rating - 1,146.81 rating)Percentile7.41%Participants28Votes83,404EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank27ModelPESonar Reasoning ProPerplexityArena Rating1,138.13 rating (1,132.25 rating - 1,144.02 rating)Percentile3.70%Participants28Votes29,055EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026
Rank28ModelXAGrok-4xAIArena Rating1,121.48 rating (1,115.41 rating - 1,127.55 rating)Percentile0.00%Participants28Votes19,108EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 24, 2026

LM Arena Search Style Control Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Search Style Control Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Search Style Control

The Top AI Models for LM Arena Search Style Control

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LM Arena Search Style Control?

What LM Arena Search Style Control measures and how its scores work.

LM Arena Search Style Control is a current leaderboard.

It measures Arena Rating, reported in rating units.

Scores are shown in rating. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of A.

Family
lm-arena-search-style-control
Modality
Unspecified
Primary category
Unspecified
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LM Arena. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LM Arena Search Style Control.

Which model scores highest on LM Arena Search Style Control?

GPT-5.6 Sol is currently ranked first with 1,255.76 rating.

What are the top three models on LM Arena Search Style Control?

The current leaders are GPT-5.6 Sol (1,255.76 rating), Claude Fable 5 (1,228.92 rating), and GPT-5.5 (1,223.60 rating).

Which LM Arena Search Style Control model has the lowest official input price?

Gemini 3 Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LM Arena Search Style Control results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5.5 (134.94 tok/s via OpenAI), Gemini 3 Flash (124.32 tok/s via Google), and Claude Opus 4.6 (123.15 tok/s via Anthropic).

Does the highest arena rating result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LM Arena Search Style Control measure?

It measures Arena Rating, reported in rating units.

Is a higher arena rating better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

28 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-5.6 Sol1,255.76 rating (1,248.08 rating - 1,263.45 rating)
Rank #2Claude Fable 51,228.92 rating (1,220.94 rating - 1,236.90 rating)
Rank #3GPT-5.51,223.60 rating (1,218.15 rating - 1,229.06 rating)
Rank #4Claude Opus 4.61,223.31 rating (1,218.17 rating - 1,228.45 rating)

Ranking basisThis lm arena search style control AI model leaderboard uses descending arena rating in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
    Arena Rating
    1,255.76 rating
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 2.36 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 28 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Search Style Control, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Fable 5Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,228.92 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.18 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 28 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Search Style Control, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Arena Rating
    1,223.60 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 134.94 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 28 compared models
    • 93th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Search Style Control, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,223.31 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 123.15 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 28 compared models
    • 89th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Search Style Control, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,212.03 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 28 compared models
    • 85th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Search Style Control, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LM Arena Search Style Control

GPT-5.6 Sol currently leads LM Arena Search Style Control with 1,255.76 rating. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.5
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.7
Benchmark rank #1GPT-5.6 Sol1,255.76 rating · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Fable 51,228.92 rating · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.51,223.60 rating · $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens