multimodal benchmark
ScreenSpot is a realistic GUI grounding benchmark covering mobile, desktop, and web environments.
Updated Sep 7, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score95.80% | Percentile100.00% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score95.70% | Percentile93.33% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score95.40% | Percentile86.67% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score95.40% | Percentile80.00% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAC | Score94.70% | Percentile73.33% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelAC | Score94.70% | Percentile66.67% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelAC | Score94.40% | Percentile60.00% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAC | Score94.00% | Percentile53.33% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelAC | Score93.60% | Percentile46.67% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelAC | Score92.90% | Percentile40.00% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelAC | Score88.50% | Percentile33.33% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelAM | Score88.10% | Percentile26.67% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelAC | Score87.10% | Percentile20.00% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelAM | Score85.40% | Percentile13.33% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelAC | Score84.70% | Percentile6.67% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelAM | Score83.30% | Percentile0.00% | Participants16 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What ScreenSpot measures and how its scores work.
ScreenSpot is a multimodal benchmark with over 1,200 instructions from iOS, Android, macOS, Windows and Web environments, including annotated text and icon/widget element types.
It measures visual GUI agents' ability to locate screen elements accurately from natural language instructions, using the Score metric as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about ScreenSpot.
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is currently ranked first with 95.80%.
The current leaders are Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct (95.80%), Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (95.70%), and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (95.40%).
Nova 2 Lite has the lowest matched official input price at $0.33 input / $2.8 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking (8.77 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures visual GUI agents' ability to locate screen elements accurately from natural language instructions, using the Score metric as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
16 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis screenspot AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct currently leads ScreenSpot with 95.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.