llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

long context benchmark

RULER 64k Leaderboard

RULER 64k evaluates the official 13-task RULER v1 suite at a 65536-token context budget.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

RULER 64k Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

4 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPMiniCPM-SALAOpenBMBScore92.65%Percentile100.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelIBIBM Granite 4.2 30BIBMScore89.96%Percentile66.67%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelIBIBM Granite 4.2 8BIBMScore80.99%Percentile33.33%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelIBIBM Granite 4.2 3BIBMScore67.52%Percentile0.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

RULER 64k Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

RULER 64k Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

RULER 64k

The Top AI Models for RULER 64k

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is RULER 64k?

What RULER 64k measures and how its scores work.

RULER 64k is a long-context benchmark based on the official 13-task RULER v1 suite.

It reports Score as a ratio for evaluation at a 65536-token context budget.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
RULER 64k
Modality
text
Primary category
long context
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about RULER 64k.

Which model scores highest on RULER 64k?

MiniCPM-SALA is currently ranked first with 92.65%.

What are the top three models on RULER 64k?

The current leaders are MiniCPM-SALA (92.65%), IBM Granite 4.2 30B (89.96%), and IBM Granite 4.2 8B (80.99%).

Which RULER 64k model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among RULER 64k results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does RULER 64k measure?

It reports Score as a ratio for evaluation at a 65536-token context budget.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

4 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1MiniCPM-SALA92.65%
Rank #2IBM Granite 4.2 30B89.96%
Rank #3IBM Granite 4.2 8B80.99%
Rank #4IBM Granite 4.2 3B67.52%

Ranking basisThis ruler 64k AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    MiniCPM-SALAOpenBMB
    Score
    92.65%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 4 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures RULER 64k, not total model capability
  2. 02
    IB
    IBM Granite 4.2 30BIBM
    Score
    89.96%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 4 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures RULER 64k, not total model capability
  3. 03
    IB
    IBM
    Score
    80.99%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 4 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures RULER 64k, not total model capability
  4. 04
    IB
    IBM
    Score
    67.52%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 4 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures RULER 64k, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for RULER 64k

MiniCPM-SALA currently leads RULER 64k with 92.65%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

IBM Granite 4.2 8B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Benchmark rank #1MiniCPM-SALA92.65%
Benchmark rank #2IBM Granite 4.2 30B89.96%
Benchmark rank #3IBM Granite 4.2 8B80.99%