long context benchmark
RULER 64k evaluates the official 13-task RULER v1 suite at a 65536-token context budget.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelOP | Score92.65% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelIB | Score89.96% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelIB | Score80.99% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelIB | Score67.52% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What RULER 64k measures and how its scores work.
RULER 64k is a long-context benchmark based on the official 13-task RULER v1 suite.
It reports Score as a ratio for evaluation at a 65536-token context budget.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about RULER 64k.
MiniCPM-SALA is currently ranked first with 92.65%.
The current leaders are MiniCPM-SALA (92.65%), IBM Granite 4.2 30B (89.96%), and IBM Granite 4.2 8B (80.99%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It reports Score as a ratio for evaluation at a 65536-token context budget.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis ruler 64k AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
MiniCPM-SALA currently leads RULER 64k with 92.65%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.