reasoning benchmark
RepoBench evaluates repository-level code auto-completion systems through retrieval, cross-file and in-file code completion, and a combined retrieval-and-prediction pipeline for Python and Java.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMA | Score34.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis repobench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Codestral-22B currently leads RepoBench with 34.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What RepoBench measures and how its scores work.
RepoBench is a benchmark comprising RepoBench-R for retrieving relevant code snippets across files, RepoBench-C for code completion using cross-file and in-file context, and RepoBench-P for a pipeline combining retrieval and prediction.
RepoBench reports Score as a ratio for repository-level code auto-completion across its three tasks.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about RepoBench.
Codestral-22B is currently ranked first with 34.00%.
The current leaders are Codestral-22B (34.00%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
RepoBench reports Score as a ratio for repository-level code auto-completion across its three tasks.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.