llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

long context benchmark

QMSum Leaderboard

QMSum is a benchmark for query-based multi-domain meeting summarization with 1,808 query-summary pairs from 232 meetings across academic, product, and committee domains.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models2
Model coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

QMSum Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMIPhi-3.5-mini-instructMicrosoftScore21.30%Percentile100.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMIPhi-3.5-MoE-instructMicrosoftScore19.90%Percentile0.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

QMSum Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Phi-3.5-mini-instruct21.30%Rank #2Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct19.90%

QMSum Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

QMSum

The Top AI Models for QMSum

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is QMSum?

What QMSum measures and how its scores work.

QMSum is a long-context benchmark published at NAACL 2021 for summarizing meetings in response to specific queries.

QMSum measures models' ability to select and summarize relevant meeting spans based on user queries, using the Score metric with ratio as its unit.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
QMSum
Modality
text
Primary category
long context
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about QMSum.

Which model scores highest on QMSum?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is currently ranked first with 21.30%.

What are the top three models on QMSum?

The current leaders are Phi-3.5-mini-instruct (21.30%) and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct (19.90%).

Which QMSum model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among QMSum results?

The fastest matched records are Phi-3.5-mini-instruct (23.00 tok/s via Azure).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does QMSum measure?

QMSum measures models' ability to select and summarize relevant meeting spans based on user queries, using the Score metric with ratio as its unit.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Ranking basisThis qmsum AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MI
    Phi-3.5-mini-instructMicrosoft
    Score
    21.30%
    Speed
    Up to 23.00 tok/s via Azure

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 2 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures QMSum, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MI
    Phi-3.5-MoE-instructMicrosoft
    Score
    19.90%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 2 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures QMSum, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for QMSum

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct currently leads QMSum with 21.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Phi-3.5-mini-instruct21.30% · Up to 23.00 tok/s via Azure
Benchmark rank #2Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct19.90%