long context benchmark
QMSum is a benchmark for query-based multi-domain meeting summarization with 1,808 query-summary pairs from 232 meetings across academic, product, and committee domains.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMI | Score21.30% | Percentile100.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMI | Score19.90% | Percentile0.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What QMSum measures and how its scores work.
QMSum is a long-context benchmark published at NAACL 2021 for summarizing meetings in response to specific queries.
QMSum measures models' ability to select and summarize relevant meeting spans based on user queries, using the Score metric with ratio as its unit.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about QMSum.
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is currently ranked first with 21.30%.
The current leaders are Phi-3.5-mini-instruct (21.30%) and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct (19.90%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
The fastest matched records are Phi-3.5-mini-instruct (23.00 tok/s via Azure).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
QMSum measures models' ability to select and summarize relevant meeting spans based on user queries, using the Score metric with ratio as its unit.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis qmsum AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct currently leads QMSum with 21.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.