llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

PostTrainBench Lite Leaderboard

PostTrainBench Lite evaluates whether an agent can design and execute a full post-training strategy for a pretrained base model under a constrained time budget.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

PostTrainBench Lite Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore51.50%Percentile100.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore50.30%Percentile50.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore29.60%Percentile0.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

PostTrainBench Lite Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

PostTrainBench Lite Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

PostTrainBench Lite

The Top AI Models for PostTrainBench Lite

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is PostTrainBench Lite?

What PostTrainBench Lite measures and how its scores work.

PostTrainBench Lite is a reasoning benchmark for evaluating post-training strategy design and execution.

It measures the design and execution of data, prompts, an RL recipe, and an eval loop, scored as normalized mean reward over the improvement window.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
PostTrainBench Lite
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about PostTrainBench Lite.

Which model scores highest on PostTrainBench Lite?

GPT-5.6 Terra is currently ranked first with 51.50%.

What are the top three models on PostTrainBench Lite?

The current leaders are GPT-5.6 Terra (51.50%), GPT-5.6 Sol (50.30%), and GPT-5.6 Luna (29.60%).

Which PostTrainBench Lite model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among PostTrainBench Lite results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5.6 Terra (99.35 tok/s via OpenAI), GPT-5.6 Luna (41.87 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-5.6 Sol (2.36 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does PostTrainBench Lite measure?

It measures the design and execution of data, prompts, an RL recipe, and an eval loop, scored as normalized mean reward over the improvement window.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-5.6 Terra51.50%
Rank #2GPT-5.6 Sol50.30%
Rank #3GPT-5.6 Luna29.60%

Ranking basisThis posttrainbench lite AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
    Score
    51.50%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 99.35 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 3 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench Lite, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
    Score
    50.30%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 2.36 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 3 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench Lite, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    29.60%
    Price
    $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 41.87 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 3 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench Lite, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for PostTrainBench Lite

GPT-5.6 Terra currently leads PostTrainBench Lite with 51.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.6 Luna
Benchmark rank #1GPT-5.6 Terra51.50% · $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2GPT-5.6 Sol50.30% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.6 Luna29.60% · $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens