math benchmark
PhysicsFinals is a university-level physics problem-solving benchmark with 1,297 expert-annotated problems across six core areas.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelGO | Score63.90% | Percentile100.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelGO | Score57.40% | Percentile0.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What PhysicsFinals measures and how its scores work.
PhysicsFinals is a benchmark for university-level physics problem solving covering classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, electromagnetism, atomic physics, and optics.
It measures performance on problems requiring advanced physics knowledge and mathematical reasoning, reported as a Score with unit ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about PhysicsFinals.
Gemini 1.5 Pro is currently ranked first with 63.90%.
The current leaders are Gemini 1.5 Pro (63.90%) and Gemini 1.5 Flash (57.40%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
The fastest matched records are Gemini 1.5 Flash (150.00 tok/s via Google) and Gemini 1.5 Pro (85.00 tok/s via Google).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance on problems requiring advanced physics knowledge and mathematical reasoning, reported as a Score with unit ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis physicsfinals AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Gemini 1.5 Pro currently leads PhysicsFinals with 63.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.