reasoning benchmark
PaperBench evaluates AI agents on their ability to replicate research papers through code implementation, experimentation, and reproduction of scientific results.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score93.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMA | Score63.50% | Percentile50.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelMI | Score52.60% | Percentile0.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What PaperBench measures and how its scores work.
PaperBench is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on their ability to replicate research papers.
It measures performance on complex, multi-step workflows involving code implementation, experimentation, and reproducing scientific results from academic publications.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about PaperBench.
Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 93.00%.
The current leaders are Qwen3.8 Max (93.00%), Kimi K2.5 (63.50%), and MiniMax M3 (52.60%).
MiniMax M3 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Qwen3.8 Max (60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra) and MiniMax M3 (6.61 tok/s via MiniMax).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance on complex, multi-step workflows involving code implementation, experimentation, and reproducing scientific results from academic publications.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis paperbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen3.8 Max currently leads PaperBench with 93.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.