llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

PaperBench Leaderboard

PaperBench evaluates AI agents on their ability to replicate research papers through code implementation, experimentation, and reproduction of scientific results.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

PaperBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore93.00%Percentile100.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore63.50%Percentile50.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore52.60%Percentile0.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

PaperBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

PaperBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

PaperBench

The Top AI Models for PaperBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is PaperBench?

What PaperBench measures and how its scores work.

PaperBench is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on their ability to replicate research papers.

It measures performance on complex, multi-step workflows involving code implementation, experimentation, and reproducing scientific results from academic publications.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
PaperBench
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about PaperBench.

Which model scores highest on PaperBench?

Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 93.00%.

What are the top three models on PaperBench?

The current leaders are Qwen3.8 Max (93.00%), Kimi K2.5 (63.50%), and MiniMax M3 (52.60%).

Which PaperBench model has the lowest official input price?

MiniMax M3 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among PaperBench results?

The fastest matched records are Qwen3.8 Max (60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra) and MiniMax M3 (6.61 tok/s via MiniMax).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does PaperBench measure?

It measures performance on complex, multi-step workflows involving code implementation, experimentation, and reproducing scientific results from academic publications.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen3.8 Max93.00%
Rank #2Kimi K2.563.50%
Rank #3MiniMax M352.60%

Ranking basisThis paperbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    93.00%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 3 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PaperBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MA
    Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
    Score
    63.50%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 3 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PaperBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MI
    MiniMax
    Score
    52.60%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 6.61 tok/s via MiniMax

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 3 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PaperBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for PaperBench

Qwen3.8 Max currently leads PaperBench with 93.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

MiniMax M3
Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.8 Max93.00% · $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Kimi K2.563.50%
Benchmark rank #3MiniMax M352.60% · $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens