llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

OpenRCA Leaderboard

OpenRCA evaluates AI models on root cause analysis tasks.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

OpenRCA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

1 row
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore34.90%Percentile100.00%Participants1EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

OpenRCA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Claude Opus 4.634.90%

The Top AI Models for OpenRCA

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis openrca AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    34.90%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 123.15 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 1 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OpenRCA, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for OpenRCA

Claude Opus 4.6 currently leads OpenRCA with 34.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

What is OpenRCA?

What OpenRCA measures and how its scores work.

OpenRCA is a reasoning benchmark for evaluating AI models on root cause analysis tasks across failure cases.

It measures Score as the average ratio of failure cases in which all generated root-cause elements match the ground-truth elements.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
OpenRCA
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about OpenRCA.

Which model scores highest on OpenRCA?

Claude Opus 4.6 is currently ranked first with 34.90%.

What are the top three models on OpenRCA?

The current leaders are Claude Opus 4.6 (34.90%).

Which OpenRCA model has the lowest official input price?

Claude Opus 4.6 has the lowest matched official input price at $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among OpenRCA results?

The fastest matched records are Claude Opus 4.6 (123.15 tok/s via Anthropic).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does OpenRCA measure?

It measures Score as the average ratio of failure cases in which all generated root-cause elements match the ground-truth elements.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

1 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Claude Opus 4.6
Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 4.634.90% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens