reasoning benchmark
OpenBookQA is a question-answering dataset of 5,957 multiple-choice, elementary-level science questions based on 1,326 core science facts.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMI | Score89.60% | Percentile100.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMI | Score79.20% | Percentile75.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelMI | Score79.20% | Percentile50.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelMA | Score60.60% | Percentile25.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelNR | Score49.40% | Percentile0.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What OpenBookQA measures and how its scores work.
OpenBookQA is a benchmark modeled after open book exams that assesses human understanding through elementary-level science questions.
It measures performance using Score, reported as a ratio, on questions requiring application of science facts to novel situations and multi-hop reasoning with broad common knowledge.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about OpenBookQA.
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is currently ranked first with 89.60%.
The current leaders are Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct (89.60%), Phi-3.5-mini-instruct (79.20%), and Phi 4 Mini (79.20%).
Phi 4 Mini has the lowest matched official input price at $0.08 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Mistral NeMo Instruct (42.00 tok/s via Google) and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct (23.00 tok/s via Azure).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance using Score, reported as a ratio, on questions requiring application of science facts to novel situations and multi-hop reasoning with broad common knowledge.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
5 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis openbookqa AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct currently leads OpenBookQA with 89.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.