multimodal benchmark
OmniDocBench 1.5 is a multimodal benchmark for evaluating large language models on document understanding tasks across diverse document types.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMI | Score91.60% | Percentile100.00% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score91.40% | Percentile94.12% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score91.20% | Percentile88.24% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score91.10% | Percentile82.35% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAC | Score89.90% | Percentile76.47% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelAC | Score89.80% | Percentile70.59% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelAC | Score89.30% | Percentile64.71% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelOP | Score89.10% | Percentile58.82% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelAC | Score88.90% | Percentile52.94% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelMA | Score88.80% | Percentile47.06% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelOP | Score87.50% | Percentile41.18% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelOP | Score87.37% | Percentile35.29% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelOP | Score75.81% | Percentile29.41% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelME | Score75.80% | Percentile23.53% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelGO | Score31.90% | Percentile17.65% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelGO | Score16.40% | Percentile11.76% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank17 | ModelGO | Score12.10% | Percentile5.88% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank18 | ModelGO | Score11.50% | Percentile0.00% | Participants18 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What OmniDocBench 1.5 measures and how its scores work.
OmniDocBench 1.5 is a benchmark for evaluating multimodal large language models on document understanding tasks.
It measures performance on OCR, document parsing, information extraction, and visual question answering; lower Overall Edit Distance scores are better.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about OmniDocBench 1.5.
MiniMax M3 is currently ranked first with 91.60%.
The current leaders are MiniMax M3 (91.60%), Qwen3.7-Plus (91.40%), and Qwen3.6 Plus (91.20%).
GPT-5.4 nano has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.3 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are GPT-5.5 Instant (206.89 tok/s via OpenAI), Gemini 3 Flash (124.32 tok/s via Google), and GPT-5.4 nano (118.31 tok/s via OpenAI).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance on OCR, document parsing, information extraction, and visual question answering; lower Overall Edit Distance scores are better.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
18 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis omnidocbench 1.5 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
MiniMax M3 currently leads OmniDocBench 1.5 with 91.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.