llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

OmniDocBench 1.5 Leaderboard

OmniDocBench 1.5 is a multimodal benchmark for evaluating large language models on document understanding tasks across diverse document types.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models18
Model coverage18
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

OmniDocBench 1.5 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

18 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore91.60%Percentile100.00%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore91.40%Percentile94.12%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore91.20%Percentile88.24%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.8-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore91.10%Percentile82.35%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore89.90%Percentile76.47%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore89.80%Percentile70.59%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore89.30%Percentile64.71%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIScore89.10%Percentile58.82%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore88.90%Percentile52.94%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore88.80%Percentile47.06%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-5.5 InstantOpenAIScore87.50%Percentile41.18%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelOPGPT-5.4 miniOpenAIScore87.37%Percentile35.29%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIScore75.81%Percentile29.41%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore75.80%Percentile23.53%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelGODiffusionGemma 26B-A4BGoogleScore31.90%Percentile17.65%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelGOGemma 4 12BGoogleScore16.40%Percentile11.76%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelGOGemini 3 FlashGoogleScore12.10%Percentile5.88%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelGOGemini 3 ProGoogleScore11.50%Percentile0.00%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

OmniDocBench 1.5 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

OmniDocBench 1.5 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

OmniDocBench 1.5

The Top AI Models for OmniDocBench 1.5

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is OmniDocBench 1.5?

What OmniDocBench 1.5 measures and how its scores work.

OmniDocBench 1.5 is a benchmark for evaluating multimodal large language models on document understanding tasks.

It measures performance on OCR, document parsing, information extraction, and visual question answering; lower Overall Edit Distance scores are better.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
OmniDocBench 1.5
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about OmniDocBench 1.5.

Which model scores highest on OmniDocBench 1.5?

MiniMax M3 is currently ranked first with 91.60%.

What are the top three models on OmniDocBench 1.5?

The current leaders are MiniMax M3 (91.60%), Qwen3.7-Plus (91.40%), and Qwen3.6 Plus (91.20%).

Which OmniDocBench 1.5 model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.4 nano has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.3 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among OmniDocBench 1.5 results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5.5 Instant (206.89 tok/s via OpenAI), Gemini 3 Flash (124.32 tok/s via Google), and GPT-5.4 nano (118.31 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does OmniDocBench 1.5 measure?

It measures performance on OCR, document parsing, information extraction, and visual question answering; lower Overall Edit Distance scores are better.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

18 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1MiniMax M391.60%
Rank #2Qwen3.7-Plus91.40%
Rank #3Qwen3.6 Plus91.20%
Rank #4Qwen3.8-27B91.10%

Ranking basisThis omnidocbench 1.5 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MI
    MiniMax M3MiniMax
    Score
    91.60%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 6.61 tok/s via MiniMax

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 18 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OmniDocBench 1.5, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    91.40%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 18 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OmniDocBench 1.5, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    91.20%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 18 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OmniDocBench 1.5, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    91.10%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 18 compared models
    • 82th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OmniDocBench 1.5, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    89.90%
    Price
    $0.25 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 18 compared models
    • 76th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OmniDocBench 1.5, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for OmniDocBench 1.5

MiniMax M3 currently leads OmniDocBench 1.5 with 91.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Benchmark rank #1MiniMax M391.60% · $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Qwen3.7-Plus91.40% · $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.6 Plus91.20% · $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens