llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

OJBench (C++) Leaderboard

OJBench (C++) is the C++ subset of OJBench for evaluating large language models on programming competition problems from NOI and ICPC.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

OJBench (C++) Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

1 row
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore57.40%Percentile100.00%Participants1EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

OJBench (C++) Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Kimi K2.557.40%

The Top AI Models for OJBench (C++)

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis ojbench (c++) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    57.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 1 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OJBench (C++), not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for OJBench (C++)

Kimi K2.5 currently leads OJBench (C++) with 57.40%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

What is OJBench (C++)?

What OJBench (C++) measures and how its scores work.

OJBench (C++) is a competition-level code benchmark using C++ as the implementation language.

It measures large language model performance on programming competition problems from NOI and ICPC using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
OJBench (C++)
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about OJBench (C++).

Which model scores highest on OJBench (C++)?

Kimi K2.5 is currently ranked first with 57.40%.

What are the top three models on OJBench (C++)?

The current leaders are Kimi K2.5 (57.40%).

Which OJBench (C++) model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among OJBench (C++) results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does OJBench (C++) measure?

It measures large language model performance on programming competition problems from NOI and ICPC using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

1 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Kimi K2.5
Benchmark rank #1Kimi K2.557.40%