llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

MVBench Leaderboard

MVBench is a multimodal video understanding benchmark covering 20 video tasks that require temporal understanding beyond single-frame analysis.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models18
Model coverage18
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MVBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

18 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelZAGLM-5.3-FlashZhipu AIScore77.80%Percentile100.00%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore76.60%Percentile94.12%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore75.50%Percentile88.24%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore74.80%Percentile82.35%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore74.60%Percentile76.47%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore74.60%Percentile70.59%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen2-VL-72B-InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore73.60%Percentile64.71%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3 VL 32B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore73.20%Percentile58.82%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen3 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore72.80%Percentile52.94%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore72.30%Percentile47.06%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore72.00%Percentile41.18%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelACQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.40%Percentile35.29%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelACQwen2.5-Omni-7BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.30%Percentile29.41%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelACQwen2.5 VL 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore69.60%Percentile23.53%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelACQwen3 VL 4B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore69.30%Percentile17.65%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelACQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore69.00%Percentile11.76%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelACQwen3 VL 4B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore68.90%Percentile5.88%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelACQwen3 VL 8B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore68.70%Percentile0.00%Participants18EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MVBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MVBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MVBench

The Top AI Models for MVBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MVBench?

What MVBench measures and how its scores work.

MVBench is a benchmark for multimodal video understanding with tasks spanning perception and cognition, including action recognition, temporal reasoning, spatial reasoning, object interaction, scene transition, and counterfactual inference.

MVBench reports a Score in ratio units across its video tasks.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MVBench
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MVBench.

Which model scores highest on MVBench?

GLM-5.3-Flash is currently ranked first with 77.80%.

What are the top three models on MVBench?

The current leaders are GLM-5.3-Flash (77.80%), Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (76.60%), and Qwen3.6-27B (75.50%).

Which MVBench model has the lowest official input price?

GLM-5.3-Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.08 input / $0.25 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MVBench results?

The fastest matched records are GLM-5.3-Flash (74.28 tok/s via FriendliAI) and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking (8.77 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MVBench measure?

MVBench reports a Score in ratio units across its video tasks.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

18 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GLM-5.3-Flash77.80%
Rank #2Qwen3.5-122B-A10B76.60%
Rank #3Qwen3.6-27B75.50%
Rank #4Qwen3.5-35B-A3B74.80%

Ranking basisThis mvbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ZA
    GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu AI
    Score
    77.80%
    Price
    $0.08 input / $0.25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 74.28 tok/s via FriendliAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 18 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MVBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    76.60%
    Price
    $0.40 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 18 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MVBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    75.50%
    Price
    $0.60 input / $3.6 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 18 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MVBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    74.80%
    Price
    $0.25 input / $2.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 18 compared models
    • 82th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MVBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    74.60%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $2.4 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 18 compared models
    • 76th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MVBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MVBench

GLM-5.3-Flash currently leads MVBench with 77.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.6-27B
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Qwen3.5-27B
Benchmark rank #1GLM-5.3-Flash77.80% · $0.08 input / $0.25 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Qwen3.5-122B-A10B76.60% · $0.40 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.6-27B75.50% · $0.60 input / $3.6 output per 1M tokens