reasoning benchmark
Multipl-E MBPP extends the Mostly Basic Python Problems (MBPP) benchmark to 18+ programming languages with 974 crowd-sourced programming problems.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelME | Score65.70% | Percentile100.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelME | Score62.00% | Percentile50.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelME | Score52.40% | Percentile0.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What Multipl-E MBPP measures and how its scores work.
Multipl-E MBPP is a benchmark for evaluating multilingual code generation capabilities using programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers, covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality.
It measures performance on multilingual code generation using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Multipl-E MBPP.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is currently ranked first with 65.70%.
The current leaders are Llama 3.1 405B Instruct (65.70%), Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (62.00%), and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct (52.40%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
The fastest matched records are Llama 3.1 8B Instruct (2,047.00 tok/s via Cerebras), Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (1,204.00 tok/s via Cerebras), and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct (42.00 tok/s via Google).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance on multilingual code generation using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis multipl-e mbpp AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct currently leads Multipl-E MBPP with 65.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.