language benchmark
Multilingual MMLU is a multilingual benchmark based on MMLU-ProX, covering 29 typologically diverse languages with 11,829 identical questions per language.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelOP | Score80.70% | Percentile100.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMA | Score74.20% | Percentile75.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelMA | Score70.60% | Percentile50.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelMA | Score65.20% | Percentile25.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelMI | Score49.30% | Percentile0.00% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What Multilingual MMLU measures and how its scores work.
Multilingual MMLU is a benchmark for evaluating large language models across 29 languages using challenging, reasoning-focused questions with 10 answer choices.
It measures large language models' reasoning capabilities across linguistic and cultural boundaries.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Multilingual MMLU.
o3-mini is currently ranked first with 80.70%.
The current leaders are o3-mini (80.70%), Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) (74.20%), and Ministral 3 (8B Base 2512) (70.60%).
Phi 4 Mini has the lowest matched official input price at $0.08 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are o3-mini (115.00 tok/s via Azure).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures large language models' reasoning capabilities across linguistic and cultural boundaries.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
5 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis multilingual mmlu AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
o3-mini currently leads Multilingual MMLU with 80.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.