reasoning benchmark
Multi-SWE-Bench is a multilingual benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' ability to resolve software issues across Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMI | Score52.70% | Percentile100.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMI | Score51.30% | Percentile80.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelMI | Score49.40% | Percentile60.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelMA | Score41.90% | Percentile40.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelMI | Score36.20% | Percentile20.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelAC | Score25.80% | Percentile0.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What Multi-SWE-Bench measures and how its scores work.
Multi-SWE-Bench is a benchmark covering 1,632 software issue instances annotated by 68 expert annotators across seven programming languages.
It measures software issue resolution ability using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Multi-SWE-Bench.
MiniMax M2.7 is currently ranked first with 52.70%.
The current leaders are MiniMax M2.7 (52.70%), MiniMax M2.5 (51.30%), and MiniMax M2.1 (49.40%).
MiniMax M2.7 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are MiniMax M2.5 (100.00 tok/s via MiniMax), MiniMax M2.1 (100.00 tok/s via MiniMax), and MiniMax M2 (70.00 tok/s via MiniMax).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures software issue resolution ability using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
6 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis multi-swe-bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
MiniMax M2.7 currently leads Multi-SWE-Bench with 52.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.