llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Multi-SWE-Bench Leaderboard

Multi-SWE-Bench is a multilingual benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' ability to resolve software issues across Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models6
Model coverage6
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Multi-SWE-Bench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

6 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMIMiniMax M2.7MiniMaxScore52.70%Percentile100.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMIMiniMax M2.5MiniMaxScore51.30%Percentile80.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMIMiniMax M2.1MiniMaxScore49.40%Percentile60.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelMAKimi K2-Thinking-0905Moonshot AIScore41.90%Percentile40.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelMIMiniMax M2MiniMaxScore36.20%Percentile20.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3-Coder 480B A35B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore25.80%Percentile0.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Multi-SWE-Bench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Multi-SWE-Bench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Multi-SWE-Bench

The Top AI Models for Multi-SWE-Bench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Multi-SWE-Bench?

What Multi-SWE-Bench measures and how its scores work.

Multi-SWE-Bench is a benchmark covering 1,632 software issue instances annotated by 68 expert annotators across seven programming languages.

It measures software issue resolution ability using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Multi-SWE-Bench
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Multi-SWE-Bench.

Which model scores highest on Multi-SWE-Bench?

MiniMax M2.7 is currently ranked first with 52.70%.

What are the top three models on Multi-SWE-Bench?

The current leaders are MiniMax M2.7 (52.70%), MiniMax M2.5 (51.30%), and MiniMax M2.1 (49.40%).

Which Multi-SWE-Bench model has the lowest official input price?

MiniMax M2.7 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Multi-SWE-Bench results?

The fastest matched records are MiniMax M2.5 (100.00 tok/s via MiniMax), MiniMax M2.1 (100.00 tok/s via MiniMax), and MiniMax M2 (70.00 tok/s via MiniMax).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Multi-SWE-Bench measure?

It measures software issue resolution ability using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

6 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1MiniMax M2.752.70%
Rank #2MiniMax M2.551.30%
Rank #3MiniMax M2.149.40%
Rank #4Kimi K2-Thinking-090541.90%

Ranking basisThis multi-swe-bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MI
    MiniMax M2.7MiniMax
    Score
    52.70%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 6 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Multi-SWE-Bench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MI
    MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
    Score
    51.30%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via MiniMax

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 6 compared models
    • 80th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Multi-SWE-Bench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MI
    MiniMax
    Score
    49.40%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via MiniMax

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 6 compared models
    • 60th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Multi-SWE-Bench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    41.90%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 6 compared models
    • 40th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Multi-SWE-Bench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MI
    MiniMax
    Score
    36.20%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 70.00 tok/s via MiniMax

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 6 compared models
    • 20th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Multi-SWE-Bench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Multi-SWE-Bench

MiniMax M2.7 currently leads Multi-SWE-Bench with 52.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

MiniMax M2.1
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905
MiniMax M2
Benchmark rank #1MiniMax M2.752.70% · $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2MiniMax M2.551.30% · $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3MiniMax M2.149.40% · $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens