multimodal benchmark
MobileMiniWob++_SR is an adaptation of the MiniWob++ web interaction benchmark for mobile Android environments within AndroidWorld.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score91.40% | Percentile100.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score68.00% | Percentile0.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What MobileMiniWob++_SR measures and how its scores work.
A multimodal benchmark comprising 92 web interaction tasks adapted for touch-based mobile interfaces.
It measures agents' ability to navigate and interact with web applications on mobile devices using Success Rate (Score, ratio).
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MobileMiniWob++_SR.
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is currently ranked first with 91.40%.
The current leaders are Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct (91.40%) and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (68.00%).
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures agents' ability to navigate and interact with web applications on mobile devices using Success Rate (Score, ratio).
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis mobileminiwob++_sr AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct currently leads MobileMiniWob++_SR with 91.40%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.