llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

MMT-Bench Leaderboard

MMT-Bench is a multimodal benchmark with 31,325 multi-choice visual questions covering 32 core meta-tasks and 162 subtasks across scenarios including vehicle driving and embodied navigation.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MMT-Bench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

4 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelDEDeepSeek VL2DeepSeekScore63.60%Percentile100.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen2.5 VL 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore63.60%Percentile66.67%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelDEDeepSeek VL2 SmallDeepSeekScore62.90%Percentile33.33%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelDEDeepSeek VL2 TinyDeepSeekScore53.20%Percentile0.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MMT-Bench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MMT-Bench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MMT-Bench

The Top AI Models for MMT-Bench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MMT-Bench?

What MMT-Bench measures and how its scores work.

MMT-Bench is a multimodal benchmark for evaluating Large Vision-Language Models on multimodal understanding.

It measures multimodal understanding using Score, reported as a ratio, across 32 core meta-tasks and 162 subtasks.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MMT-Bench
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MMT-Bench.

Which model scores highest on MMT-Bench?

DeepSeek VL2 is currently ranked first with 63.60%.

What are the top three models on MMT-Bench?

The current leaders are DeepSeek VL2 (63.60%), Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct (63.60%), and DeepSeek VL2 Small (62.90%).

Which MMT-Bench model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MMT-Bench results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MMT-Bench measure?

It measures multimodal understanding using Score, reported as a ratio, across 32 core meta-tasks and 162 subtasks.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

4 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1DeepSeek VL263.60%
Rank #2Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct63.60%
Rank #3DeepSeek VL2 Small62.90%
Rank #4DeepSeek VL2 Tiny53.20%

Ranking basisThis mmt-bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    DE
    DeepSeek VL2DeepSeek
    Score
    63.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 4 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMT-Bench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen2.5 VL 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    63.60%
    Price
    $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 4 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMT-Bench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    DE
    DeepSeek
    Score
    62.90%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 4 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMT-Bench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    DE
    DeepSeek
    Score
    53.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 4 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMT-Bench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MMT-Bench

DeepSeek VL2 currently leads MMT-Bench with 63.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Benchmark rank #1DeepSeek VL263.60%
Benchmark rank #2Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct63.60% · $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3DeepSeek VL2 Small62.90%