multimodal benchmark
MMT-Bench is a multimodal benchmark with 31,325 multi-choice visual questions covering 32 core meta-tasks and 162 subtasks across scenarios including vehicle driving and embodied navigation.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelDE | Score63.60% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score63.60% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelDE | Score62.90% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelDE | Score53.20% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What MMT-Bench measures and how its scores work.
MMT-Bench is a multimodal benchmark for evaluating Large Vision-Language Models on multimodal understanding.
It measures multimodal understanding using Score, reported as a ratio, across 32 core meta-tasks and 162 subtasks.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MMT-Bench.
DeepSeek VL2 is currently ranked first with 63.60%.
The current leaders are DeepSeek VL2 (63.60%), Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct (63.60%), and DeepSeek VL2 Small (62.90%).
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures multimodal understanding using Score, reported as a ratio, across 32 core meta-tasks and 162 subtasks.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis mmt-bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
DeepSeek VL2 currently leads MMT-Bench with 63.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.