llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

MMStar Leaderboard

MMStar is a multimodal benchmark with 1,500 human-selected challenge samples for evaluating 6 core capabilities and 18 detailed axes.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models25
Model coverage25
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MMStar Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

25 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore83.30%Percentile100.00%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.90%Percentile95.83%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore81.90%Percentile91.67%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore81.40%Percentile87.50%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore81.00%Percentile83.33%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3 VL 32B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore79.40%Percentile79.17%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore78.70%Percentile75.00%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore78.40%Percentile70.83%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen3 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore77.70%Percentile66.67%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore75.50%Percentile62.50%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore75.30%Percentile58.33%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelLAEXAONE 4.5 33BLG AI ResearchScore74.90%Percentile54.17%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelACQwen3 VL 4B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore73.20%Percentile50.00%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore72.10%Percentile45.83%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelACQwen3 VL 8B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.90%Percentile41.67%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelACQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.80%Percentile37.50%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelACQwen3 VL 4B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore69.80%Percentile33.33%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelACQwen2.5 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore69.50%Percentile29.17%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelACQwen2.5-Omni-7BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore64.00%Percentile25.00%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelACQwen2.5 VL 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore63.90%Percentile20.83%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelLALFM2.5-VL-3BLiquid AIScore63.30%Percentile16.67%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelDEDeepSeek VL2DeepSeekScore61.30%Percentile12.50%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelDEDeepSeek VL2 SmallDeepSeekScore57.00%Percentile8.33%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelCONorth Micro Vision InstructCohereScore51.80%Percentile4.17%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelDEDeepSeek VL2 TinyDeepSeekScore45.90%Percentile0.00%Participants25EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MMStar Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MMStar Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MMStar

The Top AI Models for MMStar

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MMStar?

What MMStar measures and how its scores work.

MMStar is a multimodal benchmark comprising 1,500 challenge samples selected by humans.

It evaluates 6 core capabilities and 18 detailed axes using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MMStar
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MMStar.

Which model scores highest on MMStar?

Qwen3.6 Plus is currently ranked first with 83.30%.

What are the top three models on MMStar?

The current leaders are Qwen3.6 Plus (83.30%), Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (82.90%), and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (81.90%).

Which MMStar model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MMStar results?

The fastest matched records are Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking (8.77 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MMStar measure?

It evaluates 6 core capabilities and 18 detailed axes using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

25 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen3.6 Plus83.30%
Rank #2Qwen3.5-122B-A10B82.90%
Rank #3Qwen3.5-35B-A3B81.90%
Rank #4Qwen3.6-27B81.40%

Ranking basisThis mmstar AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    83.30%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 25 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMStar, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    82.90%
    Price
    $0.40 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 25 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMStar, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    81.90%
    Price
    $0.25 input / $2.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 25 compared models
    • 92th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMStar, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    81.40%
    Price
    $0.60 input / $3.6 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 25 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMStar, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    81.00%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $2.4 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 25 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMStar, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MMStar

Qwen3.6 Plus currently leads MMStar with 83.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Qwen3.6-27B
Qwen3.5-27B
Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.6 Plus83.30% · $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Qwen3.5-122B-A10B82.90% · $0.40 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.5-35B-A3B81.90% · $0.25 input / $2.0 output per 1M tokens