multimodal benchmark
MMMU (validation) is a validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark, featuring college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines, 30 subjects, and 183 subfields with diverse image types.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Score80.70% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAN | Score77.10% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAN | Score76.50% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAN | Score73.20% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What MMMU (validation) measures and how its scores work.
MMMU (validation) is the validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark, covering Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on college-level multimodal questions.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MMMU (validation).
Claude Opus 4.5 is currently ranked first with 80.70%.
The current leaders are Claude Opus 4.5 (80.70%), Claude Opus 4.1 (77.10%), and Claude Opus 4 (76.50%).
Claude Haiku 4.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $1.0 input / $5.0 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Claude Opus 4.1 (100.00 tok/s via Anthropic), Claude Opus 4 (100.00 tok/s via Anthropic), and Claude Haiku 4.5 (100.00 tok/s via Vertex AI).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on college-level multimodal questions.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis mmmu (validation) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Opus 4.5 currently leads MMMU (validation) with 80.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.