llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

MMMU (validation) Leaderboard

MMMU (validation) is a validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark, featuring college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines, 30 subjects, and 183 subfields with diverse image types.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MMMU (validation) Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

4 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicScore80.70%Percentile100.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Opus 4.1AnthropicScore77.10%Percentile66.67%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Opus 4AnthropicScore76.50%Percentile33.33%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Haiku 4.5AnthropicScore73.20%Percentile0.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MMMU (validation) Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MMMU (validation) Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MMMU (validation)

The Top AI Models for MMMU (validation)

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MMMU (validation)?

What MMMU (validation) measures and how its scores work.

MMMU (validation) is the validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark, covering Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering.

It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on college-level multimodal questions.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MMMU (validation)
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MMMU (validation).

Which model scores highest on MMMU (validation)?

Claude Opus 4.5 is currently ranked first with 80.70%.

What are the top three models on MMMU (validation)?

The current leaders are Claude Opus 4.5 (80.70%), Claude Opus 4.1 (77.10%), and Claude Opus 4 (76.50%).

Which MMMU (validation) model has the lowest official input price?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $1.0 input / $5.0 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MMMU (validation) results?

The fastest matched records are Claude Opus 4.1 (100.00 tok/s via Anthropic), Claude Opus 4 (100.00 tok/s via Anthropic), and Claude Haiku 4.5 (100.00 tok/s via Vertex AI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MMMU (validation) measure?

It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on college-level multimodal questions.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

4 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Opus 4.580.70%
Rank #2Claude Opus 4.177.10%
Rank #3Claude Opus 476.50%
Rank #4Claude Haiku 4.573.20%

Ranking basisThis mmmu (validation) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
    Score
    80.70%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 4 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU (validation), not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
    Score
    77.10%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 4 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU (validation), not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    76.50%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 4 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU (validation), not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    73.20%
    Price
    $1.0 input / $5.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 4 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU (validation), not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MMMU (validation)

Claude Opus 4.5 currently leads MMMU (validation) with 80.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Opus 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 4.580.70% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Opus 4.177.10% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via Anthropic
Benchmark rank #3Claude Opus 476.50% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via Anthropic