multimodal benchmark
MMMU (val) is the validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark, covering college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines, 30 subjects, and 183 subfields.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score78.10% | Percentile100.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score76.00% | Percentile91.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score76.00% | Percentile83.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score74.20% | Percentile75.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAC | Score74.10% | Percentile66.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelAC | Score70.80% | Percentile58.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelAC | Score69.60% | Percentile50.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAC | Score67.40% | Percentile41.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelGO | Score64.90% | Percentile33.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelGO | Score59.60% | Percentile25.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelGO | Score48.80% | Percentile16.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelLA | Score48.40% | Percentile8.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelCO | Score32.90% | Percentile0.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What MMMU (val) measures and how its scores work.
A validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark with questions using diverse image types, including charts, diagrams, maps, and tables.
It reports Score as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MMMU (val).
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is currently ranked first with 78.10%.
The current leaders are Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (78.10%), Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking (76.00%), and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct (76.00%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
The fastest matched records are Gemma 3 27B (33.00 tok/s via DeepInfra), Gemma 3 12B (33.00 tok/s via DeepInfra), and Gemma 3 4B (33.00 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It reports Score as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis mmmu (val) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking currently leads MMMU (val) with 78.10%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.