llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

language benchmark

MMMLU Leaderboard

MMMLU is a multilingual dataset released by OpenAI with professionally translated MMLU test questions across 14 languages and 57 subjects.

Updated Sep 7, 2026

Models49
Model coverage49
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MMMLU Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 49 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Mythos PreviewAnthropicScore92.70%Percentile100.00%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleScore92.60%Percentile97.92%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelGOGemini 3 ProGoogleScore91.80%Percentile95.83%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelGOGemini 3 FlashGoogleScore91.80%Percentile93.75%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicScore91.50%Percentile91.67%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore91.10%Percentile89.58%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicScore90.80%Percentile87.50%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore90.30%Percentile85.42%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIScore89.60%Percentile83.33%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelANClaude Opus 4.1AnthropicScore89.50%Percentile81.25%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore89.50%Percentile79.17%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicScore89.30%Percentile77.08%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.5AnthropicScore89.10%Percentile75.00%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore89.00%Percentile72.92%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelGOGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogleScore88.90%Percentile70.83%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelANClaude Opus 4AnthropicScore88.80%Percentile68.75%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore88.50%Percentile66.67%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelGOGemma 4 31BGoogleScore88.40%Percentile64.58%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelOPo1OpenAIScore87.70%Percentile62.50%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelOPGPT-4.1OpenAIScore87.30%Percentile60.42%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelACQwen3 235B A22BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore86.70%Percentile58.33%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore86.70%Percentile56.25%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelANClaude Sonnet 4AnthropicScore86.50%Percentile54.17%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelGOGemma 4 26B-A4BGoogleScore86.30%Percentile52.08%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelANClaude 3.7 SonnetAnthropicScore86.10%Percentile50.00%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore85.90%Percentile47.92%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelLAK-EXAONE-236B-A23BLG AI ResearchScore85.70%Percentile45.83%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelMAMistral Large 3 (675B Base)Mistral AIScore85.50%Percentile43.75%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank29ModelMAMistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)Mistral AIScore85.50%Percentile41.67%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank30ModelMAMistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)Mistral AIScore85.50%Percentile39.58%Participants49EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MMMLU Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MMMLU Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MMMLU

The Top AI Models for MMMLU

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MMMLU?

What MMMLU measures and how its scores work.

MMMLU is a language benchmark containing approximately 15,908 multiple-choice questions per language in Arabic, Bengali, German, Spanish, French, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Swahili, Yoruba, and Chinese.

It measures Score on multiple-choice questions, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MMMLU
Modality
text
Primary category
language
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MMMLU.

Which model scores highest on MMMLU?

Claude Mythos Preview is currently ranked first with 92.70%.

What are the top three models on MMMLU?

The current leaders are Claude Mythos Preview (92.70%), Gemini 3.1 Pro (92.60%), and Gemini 3 Pro (91.80%).

Which MMMLU model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-4.1 nano has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MMMLU results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-4.1 mini (467.39 tok/s via OpenAI), GPT-4.1 nano (138.14 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-4o (132.00 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MMMLU measure?

It measures Score on multiple-choice questions, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

49 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Mythos Preview92.70%
Rank #2Gemini 3.1 Pro92.60%
Rank #3Gemini 3 Pro91.80%
Rank #4Gemini 3 Flash91.80%

Ranking basisThis mmmlu AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Mythos PreviewAnthropic
    Score
    92.70%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 49 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMLU, not total model capability
  2. 02
    GO
    Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle
    Score
    92.60%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.79 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 49 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMLU, not total model capability
  3. 03
    GO
    Google
    Score
    91.80%
    Speed
    Up to 90.00 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 49 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMLU, not total model capability
  4. 04
    GO
    Google
    Score
    91.80%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 124.32 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 49 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMLU, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    91.50%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 49 compared models
    • 92th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMLU, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MMMLU

Claude Mythos Preview currently leads MMMLU with 92.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Gemini 3 Pro
Gemini 3 Flash
Claude Opus 4.7
Benchmark rank #1Claude Mythos Preview92.70%
Benchmark rank #2Gemini 3.1 Pro92.60% · $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Gemini 3 Pro91.80% · Up to 90.00 tok/s via Google