llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

language benchmark

MMLU-ProX Leaderboard

MMLU-ProX is an extended version of MMLU-Pro with additional challenging multiple-choice questions across diverse academic and professional domains.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models32
Model coverage32
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MMLU-ProX Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 32 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore87.00%Percentile100.00%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore85.40%Percentile96.77%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore84.70%Percentile93.55%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore84.70%Percentile90.32%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelNVNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)NVIDIAScore83.00%Percentile87.10%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.20%Percentile83.87%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.20%Percentile80.65%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore81.00%Percentile77.42%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore81.00%Percentile74.19%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore80.60%Percentile70.97%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore79.40%Percentile67.74%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelNVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIAScore79.36%Percentile64.52%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelACQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore78.70%Percentile61.29%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore77.80%Percentile58.06%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelACQwen3 VL 32B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore77.20%Percentile54.84%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelACQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore76.70%Percentile51.61%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelACQwen3.5-9BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore76.30%Percentile48.39%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore76.10%Percentile45.16%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelACQwen3 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore73.40%Percentile41.94%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelACQwen3.5-4BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore71.50%Percentile38.71%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.90%Percentile35.48%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelACQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.70%Percentile32.26%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelACQwen3 VL 8B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore65.40%Percentile29.03%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelACQwen3 VL 4B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore65.00%Percentile25.81%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelNVNemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)NVIDIAScore59.50%Percentile22.58%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelACQwen3 VL 4B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore59.40%Percentile19.35%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelACQwen3.5-2BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore52.30%Percentile16.13%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelACQwen3.5-0.8BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore34.60%Percentile12.90%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank29ModelGOGemma 3n E4B InstructedGoogleScore19.90%Percentile9.68%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank30ModelGOGemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT PreviewGoogleScore19.90%Percentile6.45%Participants32EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MMLU-ProX Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MMLU-ProX Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MMLU-ProX

The Top AI Models for MMLU-ProX

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MMLU-ProX?

What MMLU-ProX measures and how its scores work.

MMLU-ProX is a language benchmark built on the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark framework.

MMLU-ProX measures language model performance using a Score reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MMLU-ProX
Modality
text
Primary category
language
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MMLU-ProX.

Which model scores highest on MMLU-ProX?

Qwen3.7 Max is currently ranked first with 87.00%.

What are the top three models on MMLU-ProX?

The current leaders are Qwen3.7 Max (87.00%), Qwen3.7-Plus (85.40%), and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (84.70%).

Which MMLU-ProX model has the lowest official input price?

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $0.80 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MMLU-ProX results?

The fastest matched records are Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking (8.77 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MMLU-ProX measure?

MMLU-ProX measures language model performance using a Score reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

32 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen3.7 Max87.00%
Rank #2Qwen3.7-Plus85.40%
Rank #3Qwen3.5-397B-A17B84.70%
Rank #4Qwen3.6 Plus84.70%

Ranking basisThis mmlu-prox AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    87.00%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 32 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMLU-ProX, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    85.40%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 32 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMLU-ProX, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    84.70%
    Price
    $0.60 input / $3.6 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 32 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMLU-ProX, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    84.70%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 32 compared models
    • 90th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMLU-ProX, not total model capability
  5. 05
    NV
    NVIDIA
    Score
    83.00%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $2.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 32 compared models
    • 87th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMLU-ProX, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MMLU-ProX

Qwen3.7 Max currently leads MMLU-ProX with 87.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Qwen3.6 Plus
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.7 Max87.00% · $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Qwen3.7-Plus85.40% · $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.5-397B-A17B84.70% · $0.60 input / $3.6 output per 1M tokens