language benchmark
MMLU-Base is the base version of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark, covering 57 tasks across academic and professional subjects.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score68.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis mmlu-base AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct currently leads MMLU-Base with 68.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What MMLU-Base measures and how its scores work.
MMLU-Base is a language benchmark for evaluating models on 57 tasks, including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and other professional and academic subjects.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio, across these 57 tasks.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MMLU-Base.
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is currently ranked first with 68.00%.
The current leaders are Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct (68.00%).
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.14 input / $0.29 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio, across these 57 tasks.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.