llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

MMBench Leaderboard

MMBench is a bilingual benchmark for assessing the multimodal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in English and Chinese.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models9
Model coverage9
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MMBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

9 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelSTStep3-VL-10BStepFunScore91.80%Percentile100.00%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore88.00%Percentile87.50%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMIPhi-4-multimodal-instructMicrosoftScore86.70%Percentile75.00%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen2-VL-72B-InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore86.50%Percentile62.50%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen2.5 VL 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore84.30%Percentile50.00%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelMIPhi-3.5-vision-instructMicrosoftScore81.90%Percentile37.50%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelDEDeepSeek VL2 SmallDeepSeekScore80.30%Percentile25.00%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelDEDeepSeek VL2DeepSeekScore79.60%Percentile12.50%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelDEDeepSeek VL2 TinyDeepSeekScore69.20%Percentile0.00%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MMBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MMBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MMBench

The Top AI Models for MMBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MMBench?

What MMBench measures and how its scores work.

MMBench is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates vision-language models across diverse vision-language tasks using multiple-choice questions in English and Chinese.

MMBench measures vision-language model performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MMBench
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MMBench.

Which model scores highest on MMBench?

Step3-VL-10B is currently ranked first with 91.80%.

What are the top three models on MMBench?

The current leaders are Step3-VL-10B (91.80%), Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (88.00%), and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (86.70%).

Which MMBench model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MMBench results?

The fastest matched records are Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (25.00 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MMBench measure?

MMBench measures vision-language model performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

9 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Step3-VL-10B91.80%
Rank #2Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct88.00%
Rank #3Phi-4-multimodal-instruct86.70%
Rank #4Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct86.50%

Ranking basisThis mmbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ST
    Step3-VL-10BStepFun
    Score
    91.80%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 9 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    88.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 9 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MI
    Microsoft
    Score
    86.70%
    Speed
    Up to 25.00 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 9 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    86.50%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 9 compared models
    • 63th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    84.30%
    Price
    $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 9 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MMBench

Step3-VL-10B currently leads MMBench with 91.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Benchmark rank #1Step3-VL-10B91.80%
Benchmark rank #2Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct88.00%
Benchmark rank #3Phi-4-multimodal-instruct86.70% · Up to 25.00 tok/s via DeepInfra