multimodal benchmark
MMBench is a bilingual benchmark for assessing the multimodal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in English and Chinese.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelST | Score91.80% | Percentile100.00% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score88.00% | Percentile87.50% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelMI | Score86.70% | Percentile75.00% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score86.50% | Percentile62.50% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAC | Score84.30% | Percentile50.00% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelMI | Score81.90% | Percentile37.50% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelDE | Score80.30% | Percentile25.00% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelDE | Score79.60% | Percentile12.50% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelDE | Score69.20% | Percentile0.00% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What MMBench measures and how its scores work.
MMBench is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates vision-language models across diverse vision-language tasks using multiple-choice questions in English and Chinese.
MMBench measures vision-language model performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MMBench.
Step3-VL-10B is currently ranked first with 91.80%.
The current leaders are Step3-VL-10B (91.80%), Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (88.00%), and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (86.70%).
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (25.00 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
MMBench measures vision-language model performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
9 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis mmbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Step3-VL-10B currently leads MMBench with 91.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.