llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

MM IF-Eval Leaderboard

MM IF-Eval is a multimodal instruction-following benchmark covering output-response and image-related constraints.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models2
Model coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MM IF-Eval Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelLALFM2.5-VL-3BLiquid AIScore60.60%Percentile100.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMAPixtral-12BMistral AIScore52.70%Percentile0.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MM IF-Eval Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1LFM2.5-VL-3B60.60%Rank #2Pixtral-12B52.70%

MM IF-Eval Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MM IF-Eval

The Top AI Models for MM IF-Eval

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MM IF-Eval?

What MM IF-Eval measures and how its scores work.

MM IF-Eval is a multimodal benchmark for instruction following.

It measures compliance with compose-level constraints for output responses and perception-level constraints tied to input images, using the Score metric as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MM IF-Eval
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MM IF-Eval.

Which model scores highest on MM IF-Eval?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is currently ranked first with 60.60%.

What are the top three models on MM IF-Eval?

The current leaders are LFM2.5-VL-3B (60.60%) and Pixtral-12B (52.70%).

Which MM IF-Eval model has the lowest official input price?

Pixtral-12B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MM IF-Eval results?

The fastest matched records are Pixtral-12B (0.10 tok/s via Mistral AI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MM IF-Eval measure?

It measures compliance with compose-level constraints for output responses and perception-level constraints tied to input images, using the Score metric as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Ranking basisThis mm if-eval AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    LA
    LFM2.5-VL-3BLiquid AI
    Score
    60.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 2 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MM IF-Eval, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MA
    Pixtral-12BMistral AI
    Score
    52.70%
    Price
    $0.15 input / $0.15 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 0.10 tok/s via Mistral AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 2 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MM IF-Eval, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MM IF-Eval

LFM2.5-VL-3B currently leads MM IF-Eval with 60.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1LFM2.5-VL-3B60.60%
Benchmark rank #2Pixtral-12B52.70% · $0.15 input / $0.15 output per 1M tokens