reasoning benchmark
MLS-Bench Lite is the official 30-task subset of MLS-Bench for evaluating AI systems on inventing generalizable and scalable machine learning methods.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMA | Score48.30% | Percentile100.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score41.00% | Percentile50.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelMA | Score35.10% | Percentile0.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What MLS-Bench Lite measures and how its scores work.
MLS-Bench Lite is a 30-task benchmark covering LLM pretraining and post-training, robotics, world models, computer vision, reinforcement learning, optimization, ML systems, and AI for Science.
It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, for inventing generalizable and scalable machine learning methods across these areas.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MLS-Bench Lite.
Kimi K3 is currently ranked first with 48.30%.
The current leaders are Kimi K3 (48.30%), Qwen3.8 Max (41.00%), and Kimi K2.7 Code (35.10%).
Kimi K2.7 Code has the lowest matched official input price at $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Qwen3.8 Max (60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, for inventing generalizable and scalable machine learning methods across these areas.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis mls-bench lite AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Kimi K3 currently leads MLS-Bench Lite with 48.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.