agents benchmark
MLE-Bench Lite evaluates AI agents on machine learning engineering tasks for Kaggle-style competitions in a lightweight evaluation format.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMI | Score66.60% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis mle-bench lite AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
MiniMax M2.7 currently leads MLE-Bench Lite with 66.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What MLE-Bench Lite measures and how its scores work.
MLE-Bench Lite is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on machine learning engineering tasks.
It measures agents' ability to build, train, and optimize machine learning models, using the Score metric with ratio as the unit.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MLE-Bench Lite.
MiniMax M2.7 is currently ranked first with 66.60%.
The current leaders are MiniMax M2.7 (66.60%).
MiniMax M2.7 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures agents' ability to build, train, and optimize machine learning models, using the Score metric with ratio as the unit.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.