agents benchmark
MiMo Coding Bench evaluates coding-agent capabilities on software engineering tasks, with results reported for the MiMo model family.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelXI | Score73.70% | Percentile100.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelXI | Score71.80% | Percentile0.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What MiMo Coding Bench measures and how its scores work.
MiMo Coding Bench is a benchmark for evaluating coding-agent capabilities on software engineering tasks.
It measures coding-agent capabilities on software engineering tasks using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MiMo Coding Bench.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is currently ranked first with 73.70%.
The current leaders are MiMo-V2.5-Pro (73.70%) and MiMo-V2.5 (71.80%).
MiMo-V2.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are MiMo-V2.5 (5.39 tok/s via DeepInfra) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (5.27 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures coding-agent capabilities on software engineering tasks using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis mimo coding bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
MiMo-V2.5-Pro currently leads MiMo Coding Bench with 73.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.