long context benchmark
MemoryBench is an internal recall evaluation over 64K-100K-token conversations containing distractors, conflicting facts, and later updates.
Updated Oct 23, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelME | Score85.60% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelME | Score85.60% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelME | Score85.50% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelME | Score85.50% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What MemoryBench measures and how its scores work.
MemoryBench is a long_context benchmark that evaluates recall in conversations ranging from 64K to 100K tokens, using an LLM judge with weighted question-specific rubrics.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio, for recall across conversations with distractors, conflicting facts, and later updates.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MemoryBench.
Muse Wonder is currently ranked first with 85.60%.
The current leaders are Muse Wonder (85.60%), Muse Wonder (85.60%), and Muse Wonder Full (85.50%).
Muse Wonder has the lowest matched official input price at $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio, for recall across conversations with distractors, conflicting facts, and later updates.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis memorybench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Muse Wonder currently leads MemoryBench with 85.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.