llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

long context benchmark

MemoryBench Leaderboard

MemoryBench is an internal recall evaluation over 64K-100K-token conversations containing distractors, conflicting facts, and later updates.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MemoryBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

4 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMEMuse WonderMetaScore85.60%Percentile100.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelMEMuse WonderMetaScore85.60%Percentile66.67%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelMEMuse Wonder FullMetaScore85.50%Percentile33.33%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelMEMuse Wonder FullMetaScore85.50%Percentile0.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

MemoryBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MemoryBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MemoryBench

The Top AI Models for MemoryBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MemoryBench?

What MemoryBench measures and how its scores work.

MemoryBench is a long_context benchmark that evaluates recall in conversations ranging from 64K to 100K tokens, using an LLM judge with weighted question-specific rubrics.

It measures Score, reported as a ratio, for recall across conversations with distractors, conflicting facts, and later updates.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MemoryBench
Modality
text
Primary category
long context
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MemoryBench.

Which model scores highest on MemoryBench?

Muse Wonder is currently ranked first with 85.60%.

What are the top three models on MemoryBench?

The current leaders are Muse Wonder (85.60%), Muse Wonder (85.60%), and Muse Wonder Full (85.50%).

Which MemoryBench model has the lowest official input price?

Muse Wonder has the lowest matched official input price at $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MemoryBench results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MemoryBench measure?

It measures Score, reported as a ratio, for recall across conversations with distractors, conflicting facts, and later updates.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

4 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Muse Wonder85.60%
Rank #2Muse Wonder85.60%
Rank #3Muse Wonder Full85.50%
Rank #4Muse Wonder Full85.50%

Ranking basisThis memorybench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Muse WonderMeta
    Score
    85.60%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 4 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MemoryBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    ME
    Muse WonderMeta
    Score
    85.60%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 4 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MemoryBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    85.50%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 4 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MemoryBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    85.50%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 4 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MemoryBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MemoryBench

Muse Wonder currently leads MemoryBench with 85.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Muse Wonder Full
Muse Wonder Full
Benchmark rank #1Muse Wonder85.60% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Muse Wonder85.60% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Muse Wonder Full85.50%