multimodal benchmark
MELD is a multimodal, multi-party dataset for emotion recognition in conversations, containing approximately 13,000 utterances from 1,433 dialogues extracted from the TV series Friends.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score57.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis meld AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B currently leads Meld with 57.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What Meld measures and how its scores work.
MELD (Multimodal EmotionLines Dataset) is a multimodal conversational dataset with audio, visual, and textual modalities.
It measures emotion recognition using the labels Anger, Disgust, Sadness, Joy, Neutral, Surprise, and Fear, as well as sentiment labels.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Meld.
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is currently ranked first with 57.00%.
The current leaders are Qwen2.5-Omni-7B (57.00%).
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures emotion recognition using the labels Anger, Disgust, Sadness, Joy, Neutral, Surprise, and Fear, as well as sentiment labels.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.