llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

agents benchmark

MCP-Mark Leaderboard

MCP-Mark evaluates LLMs on their ability to use Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools effectively across diverse MCP server scenarios.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models8
Model coverage8
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MCP-Mark Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

8 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMAKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AIScore81.10%Percentile100.00%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore60.80%Percentile85.71%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore58.70%Percentile71.43%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore55.90%Percentile57.14%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore48.20%Percentile42.86%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore46.10%Percentile28.57%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelDEDeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeekScore38.00%Percentile14.29%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore37.00%Percentile0.00%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MCP-Mark Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MCP-Mark Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MCP-Mark

The Top AI Models for MCP-Mark

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MCP-Mark?

What MCP-Mark measures and how its scores work.

MCP-Mark is a benchmark for evaluating LLMs on Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool use.

It measures tool discovery, selection, invocation, and result interpretation, reported as a Score ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MCP-Mark
Modality
text
Primary category
agents
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MCP-Mark.

Which model scores highest on MCP-Mark?

Kimi K2.7 Code is currently ranked first with 81.10%.

What are the top three models on MCP-Mark?

The current leaders are Kimi K2.7 Code (81.10%), Qwen3.7 Max (60.80%), and Qwen3.7-Plus (58.70%).

Which MCP-Mark model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.25 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MCP-Mark results?

The fastest matched records are DeepSeek-V3.2 (97.00 tok/s via DeepInfra) and Kimi K2.6 (1.24 tok/s via Moonshot AI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MCP-Mark measure?

It measures tool discovery, selection, invocation, and result interpretation, reported as a Score ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

8 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Kimi K2.7 Code81.10%
Rank #2Qwen3.7 Max60.80%
Rank #3Qwen3.7-Plus58.70%
Rank #4Kimi K2.655.90%

Ranking basisThis mcp-mark AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
    Score
    81.10%
    Price
    $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 8 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP-Mark, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    60.80%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 8 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP-Mark, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    58.70%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 8 compared models
    • 71th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP-Mark, not total model capability
  4. 04
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    55.90%
    Price
    $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 1.24 tok/s via Moonshot AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 8 compared models
    • 57th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP-Mark, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    48.20%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 8 compared models
    • 43th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP-Mark, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MCP-Mark

Kimi K2.7 Code currently leads MCP-Mark with 81.10%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.7-Plus
Kimi K2.6
Qwen3.6 Plus
Benchmark rank #1Kimi K2.7 Code81.10% · $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Qwen3.7 Max60.80% · $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.7-Plus58.70% · $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens