llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

MBPP ++ base version Leaderboard

MBPP ++ base version is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems with task descriptions, code solutions, and automated test cases.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MBPP ++ base version Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

1 row
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMELlama 3.1 70B InstructMetaScore86.00%Percentile100.00%Participants1EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MBPP ++ base version Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Llama 3.1 70B Instruct86.00%

The Top AI Models for MBPP ++ base version

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis mbpp ++ base version AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    86.00%
    Speed
    Up to 1,204.00 tok/s via Cerebras

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 1 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MBPP ++ base version, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MBPP ++ base version

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct currently leads MBPP ++ base version with 86.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

What is MBPP ++ base version?

What MBPP ++ base version measures and how its scores work.

MBPP ++ base version is an enhanced version of MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) with additional test cases, covering problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers.

It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on Python programming problems covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MBPP ++ base version
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MBPP ++ base version.

Which model scores highest on MBPP ++ base version?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is currently ranked first with 86.00%.

What are the top three models on MBPP ++ base version?

The current leaders are Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (86.00%).

Which MBPP ++ base version model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among MBPP ++ base version results?

The fastest matched records are Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (1,204.00 tok/s via Cerebras).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MBPP ++ base version measure?

It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on Python programming problems covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

1 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Benchmark rank #1Llama 3.1 70B Instruct86.00% · Up to 1,204.00 tok/s via Cerebras