reasoning benchmark
MBPP ++ base version is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems with task descriptions, code solutions, and automated test cases.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelME | Score86.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis mbpp ++ base version AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct currently leads MBPP ++ base version with 86.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What MBPP ++ base version measures and how its scores work.
MBPP ++ base version is an enhanced version of MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) with additional test cases, covering problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on Python programming problems covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MBPP ++ base version.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is currently ranked first with 86.00%.
The current leaders are Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (86.00%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
The fastest matched records are Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (1,204.00 tok/s via Cerebras).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on Python programming problems covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.