reasoning benchmark
MBPP+ Leaderboard
MBPP+ is an enhanced version of MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) with 35x more test cases for evaluating solutions to Python programming problems.
Updated Oct 23, 2026
Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB
MBPP+ Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Sort by
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelXI | Score74.10% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score67.20% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score63.20% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelBA | Score40.20% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
MBPP+ Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
MBPP+ Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The Top AI Models for MBPP+
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What is MBPP+?
What MBPP+ measures and how its scores work.
MBPP+ is a benchmark based on MBPP, which contains 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers and covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality.
It measures performance on Python programming problems using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- MBPP+
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- reasoning
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- overall
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about MBPP+.
Which model scores highest on MBPP+?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is currently ranked first with 74.10%.
What are the top three models on MBPP+?
The current leaders are MiMo-V2.5-Pro (74.10%), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct (67.20%), and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct (63.20%).
Which MBPP+ model has the lowest official input price?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.35 input / $1.4 output per 1M tokens.
Which models are fastest among MBPP+ results?
No matched runtime record is currently available.
Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.